e9e6fadb1d
- Fix ChatBubble to handle non-string content with String() wrapper - Fix API route to use generateText for non-streaming requests - Add @ai-sdk/openai-compatible for non-OpenAI providers (DeepSeek, etc.) - Use Chat Completions API instead of Responses API for compatible providers - Update ChatBubble tests and fix component exports to kebab-case - Remove stale PascalCase ChatBubble.tsx file
191 lines
9.6 KiB
Markdown
191 lines
9.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
stepsCompleted:
|
|
- step-01-document-discovery.md
|
|
- step-02-prd-analysis.md
|
|
- step-03-epic-coverage-validation.md
|
|
- step-04-ux-alignment.md
|
|
- step-05-epic-quality-review.md
|
|
- step-06-final-assessment.md
|
|
files:
|
|
prd: /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md
|
|
architecture: /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/architecture.md
|
|
epics: /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/epics.md
|
|
ux: /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/ux-design-specification.md
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Implementation Readiness Assessment Report
|
|
|
|
**Date:** 2026-01-21
|
|
**Project:** Test01
|
|
|
|
## PRD Analysis
|
|
|
|
### Functional Requirements
|
|
|
|
**Dual-Agent Pipeline (Core Innovation)**
|
|
* **FR-01:** System can detect "Venting" vs. "Insight" intent from initial user input.
|
|
* **FR-02:** "Teacher Agent" can generate probing questions to elicit specific missing details based on the user's initial input.
|
|
* **FR-03:** "Ghostwriter Agent" can transform the structured interview data into a grammatically correct and structured "Enlightenment" artifact (e.g., Markdown post).
|
|
* **FR-04:** Users can "Regenerate" the outcome with specific critique (e.g., "Make it less corporate", "Focus more on the technical solution").
|
|
* **FR-05:** System provides a "Fast Track" option to bypass the interview and go straight to generation for advanced users.
|
|
|
|
**Content Management**
|
|
* **FR-06:** Users can view a chronological feed of past "Enlightenments" (history).
|
|
* **FR-07:** Users can "One-Click Copy" the formatted text to clipboard.
|
|
* **FR-08:** Users can delete past entries.
|
|
* **FR-09:** Users can edit the generated draft manually before exporting.
|
|
|
|
**PWA & Offline Capabilities**
|
|
* **FR-10:** Users can access the app and view history while offline.
|
|
* **FR-11:** Users can complete a full "Venting Session" offline; system queues generation for reconnection.
|
|
* **FR-12:** System actively prompts users to "Add to Home Screen" (A2HS) upon meeting engagement criteria.
|
|
|
|
**Data & Privacy**
|
|
* **FR-13:** System stores all chat history locally (persistent client-side storage) by default.
|
|
* **FR-14:** Users can export their entire history as a JSON/Markdown file.
|
|
|
|
Total FRs: 14
|
|
|
|
### Non-Functional Requirements
|
|
|
|
**Performance & Responsiveness**
|
|
* **NFR-01 (Chat Latency):** The "Teacher" agent must generate the first follow-up question within **< 3 seconds** to maintain conversational flow.
|
|
* **NFR-02 (App Load Time):** The app must be interactive (Time to Interactive) in **< 1.5 seconds** on 4G networks.
|
|
|
|
**Privacy & Security**
|
|
* **NFR-03 (Data Sovereignty):** User chat logs are stored **100% Client-Side** (persistent client-side storage) in the MVP. No user content is sent to the cloud except for the temporary API inference call.
|
|
* **NFR-04 (Inference Privacy):** Data sent to the LLM API must be stateless (not used for training).
|
|
|
|
**Reliability & Offline**
|
|
* **NFR-05 (Offline Behavior):** The app shell and local history must remain accessible in Aeroplane Mode. **Note:** Active Chat interactions will be unavailable offline as they require live LLM access.
|
|
* **NFR-06 (Data Persistence):** Drafts must be auto-saved locally every **2 seconds** to prevent data loss.
|
|
|
|
**Accessibility**
|
|
* **NFR-07 (Visual Accessibility):** Dark Mode is the default. Contrast ratios must meet **WCAG AA** standards to reduce eye strain for late-night users.
|
|
|
|
Total NFRs: 7
|
|
|
|
### Additional Requirements
|
|
|
|
**Domain-Specific Requirements**
|
|
* **Data Privacy (Adult Learners):** Strict control over private "Venting" logs.
|
|
* **Content Moderation:** Guardrails to prevent generating toxic/offensive content.
|
|
* **Tone Safety:** "Professional yet Authentic" tone.
|
|
* **Hallucination Prevention:** Strict prompt engineering grounded in user input.
|
|
* **Bloom's Taxonomy Application:** Scaffolding from Remembering -> Understanding -> Creating.
|
|
|
|
**PWA Technical Constraints**
|
|
* **Installability:** Valid `manifest.json`.
|
|
* **Browser Support:** Tier 1 (iOS Safari, Android Chrome).
|
|
* **SEO Strategy:** Public marketing page indexed; private app routes `noindex`.
|
|
|
|
### PRD Completeness Assessment
|
|
The PRD is highly detailed and structurally sound. Requirements are specific, measurable (where applicable), and traceable to user journeys. The core innovation (Dual-Agent) is clearly defined in FRs. NFRs cover critical PWA aspects like offline behavior and privacy. The scope is well-bounded for an MVP.
|
|
|
|
## Epic Coverage Validation
|
|
|
|
### Coverage Matrix
|
|
|
|
| FR Number | PRD Requirement | Epic Coverage | Status |
|
|
| :-------- | :----------------------------------- | :------------------------------- | :-------- |
|
|
| **FR-01** | Detect "Venting" vs "Insight" intent | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-02** | Teacher probing questions | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-03** | Ghostwriter drafting | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-04** | Regenerate with critique | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-05** | Fast Track option | Epic 4: Advanced Workflow | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-06** | History feed | Epic 2: Content Management | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-07** | One-Click Copy | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-08** | Delete entries | Epic 2: Content Management | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-09** | Manual draft editing | Epic 2: Content Management | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-10** | Offline access | Epic 3: Offline Capability | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-11** | Offline venting session | Epic 3: Offline Capability | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-12** | Add to Home Screen prompts | Epic 3: Offline Capability | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-13** | Local storage (client-side) | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
|
|
| **FR-14** | Export history | Epic 2: Content Management | ✅ Covered |
|
|
|
|
### Missing Requirements
|
|
|
|
* **None.** All Functional Requirements are explicitly mapped to Epics and Stories.
|
|
|
|
### Coverage Statistics
|
|
|
|
* **Total PRD FRs:** 14
|
|
* **FRs covered in epics:** 14
|
|
* **Coverage percentage:** 100%
|
|
|
|
## UX Alignment Assessment
|
|
|
|
### UX Document Status
|
|
|
|
**Found:** `ux-design-specification.md`
|
|
|
|
### Alignment Analysis
|
|
|
|
The UX Specification is fully aligned with both the PRD and Reference Architecture.
|
|
|
|
**UX ↔ PRD Alignment**
|
|
* **Core Loop:** The "Venting -> Insight" journey in the PRD is perfectly visualized in the UX "Daily Vent" flow.
|
|
* **Dual-Agent Interaction:** The UX explicitly designs for "Teacher" (Chat Bubble) and "Ghostwriter" (Draft Card) distinct visual modes, supporting PRD FR-01/02/03.
|
|
* **PWA Features:** PRD FR-10/12 (Offline/A2HS) are central to the UX "Platform Strategy" and "Responsive Design" sections.
|
|
|
|
**UX ↔ Architecture Alignment**
|
|
* **Tech Stack:** Both documents specify **ShadCN UI** + **Tailwind** + **Next.js**.
|
|
* **State Management:** UX "Slide-Up" sheets are supported by the Architecture's decision to use **Zustand** for transient UI state.
|
|
* **Offline Data:** UX requirement for "local retention" is backed by the **Dexie.js** decision in Architecture.
|
|
* **Visual System:** The "Morning Mist" theme is acknowledged as a cross-cutting concern in Architecture.
|
|
|
|
### Alignment Issues
|
|
|
|
* **None.** The documentation set is highly coherent.
|
|
|
|
### Warnings
|
|
|
|
* **None.**
|
|
|
|
## Epic Quality Review
|
|
|
|
### Structure Validation
|
|
|
|
* **User Value Focus:** ✅ **PASS**. All 4 Epics focus on User Outcomes ("Venting", "Legacy Log", "Access Anywhere", "Streamlined Flow"). No pure "Technical Epics" found.
|
|
* **Epic Independence:** ✅ **PASS**. Epic 1 provides the core end-to-end value independently. Epic 2 and 3 add value on top without creating circular dependencies.
|
|
* **Greenfield Compliance:** ✅ **PASS**. Epic 1 Story 1 ("Project Initialization") correctly follows the Greenfield project requirement to set up the foundation first.
|
|
|
|
### Story Quality Assessment
|
|
|
|
* **Sizing:** Stories are well-sliced (e.g., separating "Teacher Logic" from "Ghostwriter Logic" ensures clear scope).
|
|
* **Acceptance Criteria:** All stories use strict **Given/When/Then** BDD format with clear success states.
|
|
* **Dependencies:** Stories follow a logical linear progression (Init -> Basic Chat -> Agents -> Refinement).
|
|
|
|
### Violations Finding
|
|
|
|
* **Critical Violations:** None.
|
|
* **Major Issues:** None.
|
|
* **Minor Concerns:** None.
|
|
|
|
### Recommendations
|
|
|
|
* **Strategy:** The planned Epic breakdown is **Ready for Implementation**.
|
|
* **Testing:** Ensure Story 3.2 ("Action Replay Queue") is tested under actual offline conditions (Airplane Mode) as per AC.
|
|
|
|
## Summary and Recommendations
|
|
|
|
### Overall Readiness Status
|
|
|
|
# ✅ READY FOR IMPLEMENTATION
|
|
|
|
The project documentation (PRD, Architecture, UX, Epics) is complete, coherent, and highly traceable. The "Greenfield" MVP scope is well-defined and structurally sound.
|
|
|
|
### Critical Issues Requiring Immediate Action
|
|
|
|
* **None.** Zero critical blocking issues were identified across 4 validation passes.
|
|
|
|
### Recommended Next Steps
|
|
|
|
1. **Sprint Planning:** Move to Phase 4 and load Epics into the sprint tracker.
|
|
2. **Initialize Project:** Execute Epic 1 / Story 1.1 to scaffold the Next.js PWA.
|
|
3. **Setup Edge Proxy:** Prioritize the security layer (Story 1.1) before building features.
|
|
|
|
### Final Note
|
|
|
|
This assessment identified **0** critical issues across **4** categories (Requirements, UX, Architecture, Epics). The project is in an optimal state to begin coding.
|