Brachnha/brachnha-insight
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
0c87bc7dd383d81982dd709b3b0cc6e33be4f750
brachnha-insight/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/implementation-readiness-report-2026-01-21.md
Max e9e6fadb1d fix: ChatBubble crash and DeepSeek API compatibility 
- Fix ChatBubble to handle non-string content with String() wrapper
- Fix API route to use generateText for non-streaming requests
- Add @ai-sdk/openai-compatible for non-OpenAI providers (DeepSeek, etc.)
- Use Chat Completions API instead of Responses API for compatible providers
- Update ChatBubble tests and fix component exports to kebab-case
- Remove stale PascalCase ChatBubble.tsx file
2026-01-26 16:55:05 +07:00

9.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

stepsCompleted, files
stepsCompleted files
step-01-document-discovery.md
step-02-prd-analysis.md
step-03-epic-coverage-validation.md
step-04-ux-alignment.md
step-05-epic-quality-review.md
step-06-final-assessment.md
prd architecture epics ux
/home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/architecture.md /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/epics.md /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/ux-design-specification.md

Implementation Readiness Assessment Report

Date: 2026-01-21 Project: Test01

PRD Analysis

Functional Requirements

Dual-Agent Pipeline (Core Innovation)

  • FR-01: System can detect "Venting" vs. "Insight" intent from initial user input.
  • FR-02: "Teacher Agent" can generate probing questions to elicit specific missing details based on the user's initial input.
  • FR-03: "Ghostwriter Agent" can transform the structured interview data into a grammatically correct and structured "Enlightenment" artifact (e.g., Markdown post).
  • FR-04: Users can "Regenerate" the outcome with specific critique (e.g., "Make it less corporate", "Focus more on the technical solution").
  • FR-05: System provides a "Fast Track" option to bypass the interview and go straight to generation for advanced users.

Content Management

  • FR-06: Users can view a chronological feed of past "Enlightenments" (history).
  • FR-07: Users can "One-Click Copy" the formatted text to clipboard.
  • FR-08: Users can delete past entries.
  • FR-09: Users can edit the generated draft manually before exporting.

PWA & Offline Capabilities

  • FR-10: Users can access the app and view history while offline.
  • FR-11: Users can complete a full "Venting Session" offline; system queues generation for reconnection.
  • FR-12: System actively prompts users to "Add to Home Screen" (A2HS) upon meeting engagement criteria.

Data & Privacy

  • FR-13: System stores all chat history locally (persistent client-side storage) by default.
  • FR-14: Users can export their entire history as a JSON/Markdown file.

Total FRs: 14

Non-Functional Requirements

Performance & Responsiveness

  • NFR-01 (Chat Latency): The "Teacher" agent must generate the first follow-up question within < 3 seconds to maintain conversational flow.
  • NFR-02 (App Load Time): The app must be interactive (Time to Interactive) in < 1.5 seconds on 4G networks.

Privacy & Security

  • NFR-03 (Data Sovereignty): User chat logs are stored 100% Client-Side (persistent client-side storage) in the MVP. No user content is sent to the cloud except for the temporary API inference call.
  • NFR-04 (Inference Privacy): Data sent to the LLM API must be stateless (not used for training).

Reliability & Offline

  • NFR-05 (Offline Behavior): The app shell and local history must remain accessible in Aeroplane Mode. Note: Active Chat interactions will be unavailable offline as they require live LLM access.
  • NFR-06 (Data Persistence): Drafts must be auto-saved locally every 2 seconds to prevent data loss.

Accessibility

  • NFR-07 (Visual Accessibility): Dark Mode is the default. Contrast ratios must meet WCAG AA standards to reduce eye strain for late-night users.

Total NFRs: 7

Additional Requirements

Domain-Specific Requirements

  • Data Privacy (Adult Learners): Strict control over private "Venting" logs.
  • Content Moderation: Guardrails to prevent generating toxic/offensive content.
  • Tone Safety: "Professional yet Authentic" tone.
  • Hallucination Prevention: Strict prompt engineering grounded in user input.
  • Bloom's Taxonomy Application: Scaffolding from Remembering -> Understanding -> Creating.

PWA Technical Constraints

  • Installability: Valid manifest.json.
  • Browser Support: Tier 1 (iOS Safari, Android Chrome).
  • SEO Strategy: Public marketing page indexed; private app routes noindex.

PRD Completeness Assessment

The PRD is highly detailed and structurally sound. Requirements are specific, measurable (where applicable), and traceable to user journeys. The core innovation (Dual-Agent) is clearly defined in FRs. NFRs cover critical PWA aspects like offline behavior and privacy. The scope is well-bounded for an MVP.

Epic Coverage Validation

Coverage Matrix

FR Number PRD Requirement Epic Coverage Status
FR-01 Detect "Venting" vs "Insight" intent Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" ✅ Covered
FR-02 Teacher probing questions Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" ✅ Covered
FR-03 Ghostwriter drafting Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" ✅ Covered
FR-04 Regenerate with critique Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" ✅ Covered
FR-05 Fast Track option Epic 4: Advanced Workflow ✅ Covered
FR-06 History feed Epic 2: Content Management ✅ Covered
FR-07 One-Click Copy Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" ✅ Covered
FR-08 Delete entries Epic 2: Content Management ✅ Covered
FR-09 Manual draft editing Epic 2: Content Management ✅ Covered
FR-10 Offline access Epic 3: Offline Capability ✅ Covered
FR-11 Offline venting session Epic 3: Offline Capability ✅ Covered
FR-12 Add to Home Screen prompts Epic 3: Offline Capability ✅ Covered
FR-13 Local storage (client-side) Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" ✅ Covered
FR-14 Export history Epic 2: Content Management ✅ Covered

Missing Requirements

  • None. All Functional Requirements are explicitly mapped to Epics and Stories.

Coverage Statistics

  • Total PRD FRs: 14
  • FRs covered in epics: 14
  • Coverage percentage: 100%

UX Alignment Assessment

UX Document Status

Found: ux-design-specification.md

Alignment Analysis

The UX Specification is fully aligned with both the PRD and Reference Architecture.

UX ↔ PRD Alignment

  • Core Loop: The "Venting -> Insight" journey in the PRD is perfectly visualized in the UX "Daily Vent" flow.
  • Dual-Agent Interaction: The UX explicitly designs for "Teacher" (Chat Bubble) and "Ghostwriter" (Draft Card) distinct visual modes, supporting PRD FR-01/02/03.
  • PWA Features: PRD FR-10/12 (Offline/A2HS) are central to the UX "Platform Strategy" and "Responsive Design" sections.

UX ↔ Architecture Alignment

  • Tech Stack: Both documents specify ShadCN UI + Tailwind + Next.js.
  • State Management: UX "Slide-Up" sheets are supported by the Architecture's decision to use Zustand for transient UI state.
  • Offline Data: UX requirement for "local retention" is backed by the Dexie.js decision in Architecture.
  • Visual System: The "Morning Mist" theme is acknowledged as a cross-cutting concern in Architecture.

Alignment Issues

  • None. The documentation set is highly coherent.

Warnings

  • None.

Epic Quality Review

Structure Validation

  • User Value Focus: ✅ PASS. All 4 Epics focus on User Outcomes ("Venting", "Legacy Log", "Access Anywhere", "Streamlined Flow"). No pure "Technical Epics" found.
  • Epic Independence: ✅ PASS. Epic 1 provides the core end-to-end value independently. Epic 2 and 3 add value on top without creating circular dependencies.
  • Greenfield Compliance: ✅ PASS. Epic 1 Story 1 ("Project Initialization") correctly follows the Greenfield project requirement to set up the foundation first.

Story Quality Assessment

  • Sizing: Stories are well-sliced (e.g., separating "Teacher Logic" from "Ghostwriter Logic" ensures clear scope).
  • Acceptance Criteria: All stories use strict Given/When/Then BDD format with clear success states.
  • Dependencies: Stories follow a logical linear progression (Init -> Basic Chat -> Agents -> Refinement).

Violations Finding

  • Critical Violations: None.
  • Major Issues: None.
  • Minor Concerns: None.

Recommendations

  • Strategy: The planned Epic breakdown is Ready for Implementation.
  • Testing: Ensure Story 3.2 ("Action Replay Queue") is tested under actual offline conditions (Airplane Mode) as per AC.

Summary and Recommendations

Overall Readiness Status

✅ READY FOR IMPLEMENTATION

The project documentation (PRD, Architecture, UX, Epics) is complete, coherent, and highly traceable. The "Greenfield" MVP scope is well-defined and structurally sound.

Critical Issues Requiring Immediate Action

  • None. Zero critical blocking issues were identified across 4 validation passes.

Recommended Next Steps

  1. Sprint Planning: Move to Phase 4 and load Epics into the sprint tracker.
  2. Initialize Project: Execute Epic 1 / Story 1.1 to scaffold the Next.js PWA.
  3. Setup Edge Proxy: Prioritize the security layer (Story 1.1) before building features.

Final Note

This assessment identified 0 critical issues across 4 categories (Requirements, UX, Architecture, Epics). The project is in an optimal state to begin coding.