- Next.js 14+ with App Router and TypeScript - Tailwind CSS and ShadCN UI styling - Zustand state management - Dexie.js for IndexedDB (local-first data) - Auth.js v5 for authentication - BMAD framework integration Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.5 KiB
name, description, nextStepFile, directEditStep, editPlan, targetWorkflowPath, validationReport
| name | description | nextStepFile | directEditStep | editPlan | targetWorkflowPath | validationReport |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| step-e-02-discover-edits | Discover what user wants to change - fix validation issues, make changes, or both | ./step-e-03-fix-validation.md | ./step-e-04-direct-edit.md | {bmb_creations_output_folder}/edit-plan-{workflow_name}.md | {targetWorkflowPath} | {targetWorkflowPath}/validation-report-{workflow_name}.md |
Edit Step 2: Discover Edits
STEP GOAL:
Discover what the user wants to do: fix validation issues, make specific changes, or both. Document edit goals in the edit plan.
MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
Universal Rules:
- 🛑 NEVER assume what edits are needed
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not an autonomous editor
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config
{communication_language}
Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on understanding edit goals
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make any modifications yet
- 💬 Ask clarifying questions
- 🚪 CATEGORIZE edits by type
EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Guide discovery conversation
- 💾 Document edit goals in edit plan
- 📖 Determine which next step to load
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user confirmation
CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Edit plan from previous step provides context
- Validation report (if exists) provides issues to fix
- Focus: What does user want to change?
- This is discovery, not implementation
MANDATORY SEQUENCE
CRITICAL: Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip or shortcut.
1. Read Edit Plan Context
Load the editPlan file:
Read {editPlan} to understand the workflow context and validation status.
2. Determine Discovery Approach
IF validation report exists AND has issues:
Present fix-or-change options (step 3a)
ELSE (no validation report or no issues):
Present direct change options (step 3b)
3a. Discovery With Validation Issues
IF validation report exists with issues:
"I found an existing validation report for this workflow.
Validation Summary:
- Status: {status from report}
- Critical Issues: {count}
- Warnings: {count}
What would you like to do?
[F]ix Validation Issues - Systematically fix issues found in validation [C]hange Something - Make a specific change (add feature, modify step, etc.) [B]oth - Fix validation issues, then make a change [R]eview Report - See detailed validation findings first
Menu Handling Logic:
- IF F: Proceed to Document Fix Goals, then route to {nextStepFile}
- IF C: Proceed to Document Change Goals
- IF B: Document both fix and change goals, then route to {nextStepFile} for fixes first
- IF R: Present key findings from validation report, then redisplay this menu
- IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu"
3b. Discovery For Direct Change
IF no validation report or no issues:
"What would you like to change about this workflow?
I can help you modify:
[W]orkflow.md - Goal, role, initialization, routing [S]tep Files - Add, remove, or modify steps [D]ata Files - Add or modify reference data in data/ folder [T]emplates - Add or modify output templates [M]ultiple - Changes across multiple areas [O]ther - Something else
Which areas would you like to edit?"
For Each Selected Category:
If Workflow.md selected:
- "What aspects need change?"
- Goal or description?
- Role definition?
- Architecture principles?
- Initialization/routing?
If Step Files selected:
- "What type of step changes?"
- Add new step?
- Remove existing step?
- Modify step content?
- Reorder steps?
If Data Files selected:
- "What data changes?"
- Add new data file?
- Modify existing data?
- Add/remove data entries?
If Templates selected:
- "What template changes?"
- Add new template?
- Modify template structure?
- Change variable references?"
If Multiple selected:
- Walk through each area systematically
If Other selected:
- "Describe what you'd like to change..."
4. Document Fix Goals (For Validation Issues)
Append to editPlan:
## Edit Goals
### Fix Validation Issues
**Priority: High** - These issues prevent compliance
**Critical Issues to Fix:**
- [ ] {issue from validation report}
- [ ] {issue from validation report}
**Warnings to Address:**
- [ ] {warning from validation report}
- [ ] {warning from validation report}
5. Document Change Goals
Append to editPlan:
### Direct Changes
**Category:** [workflow.md / step files / data / templates / other]
**Changes Requested:**
- [ ] {specific change description}
- [ ] {specific change description}
**Rationale:**
{user's explanation of why this change is needed}
6. Confirm and Route
Present summary for confirmation:
"Here's what I heard you want to do:
{Summarize all edit goals clearly}
Did I capture everything correctly?
- [C] Yes, continue
- [M] Modify the plan
- Cancel"
Menu Handling Logic:
- IF C: Update editPlan stepsCompleted, then route based on goals:
- If Fix goals only: Load, read entirely, then execute {nextStepFile} (fix-validation)
- If Change goals only: Load, read entirely, then execute {directEditStep}
- If Both: Load, read entirely, then execute {nextStepFile} (fix first, then direct edit after)
- IF M: Return to relevant discovery section
- IF X: Exit with explanation
- IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu
7. Present MENU OPTIONS (Final)
Display: "Edit Goals Confirmed. Select an Option: [C] Continue to Edits"
Menu Handling Logic:
- IF C: Save editPlan with confirmed goals, then load appropriate next step based on Route Based on Goals
- IF Any other: help user respond, then redisplay menu
CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
ONLY WHEN user confirms goals and routing is determined, will you then load and read fully the appropriate next step file to execute.
🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
✅ SUCCESS:
- Edit goals clearly documented
- User confirmed the plan
- Routing determined (fix vs direct vs both)
- Edit plan updated with goals
- Appropriate next step selected
❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Not documenting edit goals
- Routing to wrong next step
- Not getting user confirmation
- Missing changes user mentioned
Master Rule: Discovery must be thorough. Document all goals. Route correctly based on whether fixes, changes, or both are needed.