brachnha-insight/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/implementation-readiness-report-2026-01-21.md

stepsCompleted, files

stepsCompleted	files
step-01-document-discovery.md step-02-prd-analysis.md step-03-epic-coverage-validation.md step-04-ux-alignment.md step-05-epic-quality-review.md step-06-final-assessment.md	prd architecture epics ux /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/architecture.md /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/epics.md /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/ux-design-specification.md

Implementation Readiness Assessment Report

Date: 2026-01-21 Project: Test01

PRD Analysis

Functional Requirements

Dual-Agent Pipeline (Core Innovation)

• FR-01: System can detect "Venting" vs. "Insight" intent from initial user input.
• FR-02: "Teacher Agent" can generate probing questions to elicit specific missing details based on the user's initial input.
• FR-03: "Ghostwriter Agent" can transform the structured interview data into a grammatically correct and structured "Enlightenment" artifact (e.g., Markdown post).
• FR-04: Users can "Regenerate" the outcome with specific critique (e.g., "Make it less corporate", "Focus more on the technical solution").
• FR-05: System provides a "Fast Track" option to bypass the interview and go straight to generation for advanced users.

Content Management

• FR-06: Users can view a chronological feed of past "Enlightenments" (history).
• FR-07: Users can "One-Click Copy" the formatted text to clipboard.
• FR-08: Users can delete past entries.
• FR-09: Users can edit the generated draft manually before exporting.

PWA & Offline Capabilities

• FR-10: Users can access the app and view history while offline.
• FR-11: Users can complete a full "Venting Session" offline; system queues generation for reconnection.
• FR-12: System actively prompts users to "Add to Home Screen" (A2HS) upon meeting engagement criteria.

Data & Privacy

• FR-13: System stores all chat history locally (persistent client-side storage) by default.
• FR-14: Users can export their entire history as a JSON/Markdown file.

Total FRs: 14

Non-Functional Requirements

Performance & Responsiveness

• NFR-01 (Chat Latency): The "Teacher" agent must generate the first follow-up question within < 3 seconds to maintain conversational flow.
• NFR-02 (App Load Time): The app must be interactive (Time to Interactive) in < 1.5 seconds on 4G networks.

Privacy & Security

• NFR-03 (Data Sovereignty): User chat logs are stored 100% Client-Side (persistent client-side storage) in the MVP. No user content is sent to the cloud except for the temporary API inference call.
• NFR-04 (Inference Privacy): Data sent to the LLM API must be stateless (not used for training).

Reliability & Offline

• NFR-05 (Offline Behavior): The app shell and local history must remain accessible in Aeroplane Mode. Note: Active Chat interactions will be unavailable offline as they require live LLM access.
• NFR-06 (Data Persistence): Drafts must be auto-saved locally every 2 seconds to prevent data loss.

Accessibility

• NFR-07 (Visual Accessibility): Dark Mode is the default. Contrast ratios must meet WCAG AA standards to reduce eye strain for late-night users.

Total NFRs: 7

Additional Requirements

Domain-Specific Requirements

• Data Privacy (Adult Learners): Strict control over private "Venting" logs.
• Content Moderation: Guardrails to prevent generating toxic/offensive content.
• Tone Safety: "Professional yet Authentic" tone.
• Hallucination Prevention: Strict prompt engineering grounded in user input.
• Bloom's Taxonomy Application: Scaffolding from Remembering -> Understanding -> Creating.

PWA Technical Constraints

• Installability: Valid manifest.json.
• Browser Support: Tier 1 (iOS Safari, Android Chrome).
• SEO Strategy: Public marketing page indexed; private app routes noindex.

PRD Completeness Assessment

The PRD is highly detailed and structurally sound. Requirements are specific, measurable (where applicable), and traceable to user journeys. The core innovation (Dual-Agent) is clearly defined in FRs. NFRs cover critical PWA aspects like offline behavior and privacy. The scope is well-bounded for an MVP.

Epic Coverage Validation

Coverage Matrix

FR Number	PRD Requirement	Epic Coverage	Status
FR-01	Detect "Venting" vs "Insight" intent	Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom"	✅ Covered
FR-02	Teacher probing questions	Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom"	✅ Covered
FR-03	Ghostwriter drafting	Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom"	✅ Covered
FR-04	Regenerate with critique	Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom"	✅ Covered
FR-05	Fast Track option	Epic 4: Advanced Workflow	✅ Covered
FR-06	History feed	Epic 2: Content Management	✅ Covered
FR-07	One-Click Copy	Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom"	✅ Covered
FR-08	Delete entries	Epic 2: Content Management	✅ Covered
FR-09	Manual draft editing	Epic 2: Content Management	✅ Covered
FR-10	Offline access	Epic 3: Offline Capability	✅ Covered
FR-11	Offline venting session	Epic 3: Offline Capability	✅ Covered
FR-12	Add to Home Screen prompts	Epic 3: Offline Capability	✅ Covered
FR-13	Local storage (client-side)	Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom"	✅ Covered
FR-14	Export history	Epic 2: Content Management	✅ Covered

Missing Requirements

• None. All Functional Requirements are explicitly mapped to Epics and Stories.

Coverage Statistics

• Total PRD FRs: 14
• FRs covered in epics: 14
• Coverage percentage: 100%

UX Alignment Assessment

UX Document Status

Found: ux-design-specification.md

Alignment Analysis

The UX Specification is fully aligned with both the PRD and Reference Architecture.

UX ↔ PRD Alignment

• Core Loop: The "Venting -> Insight" journey in the PRD is perfectly visualized in the UX "Daily Vent" flow.
• Dual-Agent Interaction: The UX explicitly designs for "Teacher" (Chat Bubble) and "Ghostwriter" (Draft Card) distinct visual modes, supporting PRD FR-01/02/03.
• PWA Features: PRD FR-10/12 (Offline/A2HS) are central to the UX "Platform Strategy" and "Responsive Design" sections.

UX ↔ Architecture Alignment

• Tech Stack: Both documents specify ShadCN UI + Tailwind + Next.js.
• State Management: UX "Slide-Up" sheets are supported by the Architecture's decision to use Zustand for transient UI state.
• Offline Data: UX requirement for "local retention" is backed by the Dexie.js decision in Architecture.
• Visual System: The "Morning Mist" theme is acknowledged as a cross-cutting concern in Architecture.

Alignment Issues

• None. The documentation set is highly coherent.

Warnings

• None.

Epic Quality Review

Structure Validation

• User Value Focus: ✅ PASS. All 4 Epics focus on User Outcomes ("Venting", "Legacy Log", "Access Anywhere", "Streamlined Flow"). No pure "Technical Epics" found.
• Epic Independence: ✅ PASS. Epic 1 provides the core end-to-end value independently. Epic 2 and 3 add value on top without creating circular dependencies.
• Greenfield Compliance: ✅ PASS. Epic 1 Story 1 ("Project Initialization") correctly follows the Greenfield project requirement to set up the foundation first.

Story Quality Assessment

• Sizing: Stories are well-sliced (e.g., separating "Teacher Logic" from "Ghostwriter Logic" ensures clear scope).
• Acceptance Criteria: All stories use strict Given/When/Then BDD format with clear success states.
• Dependencies: Stories follow a logical linear progression (Init -> Basic Chat -> Agents -> Refinement).

Violations Finding

• Critical Violations: None.
• Major Issues: None.
• Minor Concerns: None.

Recommendations

• Strategy: The planned Epic breakdown is Ready for Implementation.
• Testing: Ensure Story 3.2 ("Action Replay Queue") is tested under actual offline conditions (Airplane Mode) as per AC.

Summary and Recommendations

Overall Readiness Status

✅ READY FOR IMPLEMENTATION

The project documentation (PRD, Architecture, UX, Epics) is complete, coherent, and highly traceable. The "Greenfield" MVP scope is well-defined and structurally sound.

Critical Issues Requiring Immediate Action

• None. Zero critical blocking issues were identified across 4 validation passes.

Recommended Next Steps

1. Sprint Planning: Move to Phase 4 and load Epics into the sprint tracker.
2. Initialize Project: Execute Epic 1 / Story 1.1 to scaffold the Next.js PWA.
3. Setup Edge Proxy: Prioritize the security layer (Story 1.1) before building features.

Final Note

This assessment identified 0 critical issues across 4 categories (Requirements, UX, Architecture, Epics). The project is in an optimal state to begin coding.