Files
brachnha-insight/_bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow/steps-e/step-e-04-direct-edit.md
Max 3fbbb1a93b Initial commit: Brachnha Insight project setup
- Next.js 14+ with App Router and TypeScript
- Tailwind CSS and ShadCN UI styling
- Zustand state management
- Dexie.js for IndexedDB (local-first data)
- Auth.js v5 for authentication
- BMAD framework integration

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-26 12:28:43 +07:00

7.0 KiB

name, description, nextStepFile, editPlan, targetWorkflowPath, architecture, stepFileRules, frontmatterStandards, menuHandlingStandards, outputFormatStandards, stepTypePatterns, workflowTypeCriteria, inputDiscoveryStandards, csvDataFileStandards, intentVsPrescriptive
name description nextStepFile editPlan targetWorkflowPath architecture stepFileRules frontmatterStandards menuHandlingStandards outputFormatStandards stepTypePatterns workflowTypeCriteria inputDiscoveryStandards csvDataFileStandards intentVsPrescriptive
step-e-04-direct-edit Apply direct user-requested changes to workflow ./step-e-05-apply-edit.md {bmb_creations_output_folder}/edit-plan-{workflow_name}.md {targetWorkflowPath} ../data/architecture.md ../data/step-file-rules.md ../data/frontmatter-standards.md ../data/menu-handling-standards.md ../data/output-format-standards.md ../data/step-type-patterns.md ../data/workflow-type-criteria.md ../data/input-discovery-standards.md ../data/csv-data-file-standards.md ../data/intent-vs-prescriptive-spectrum.md

Edit Step 4: Direct Edit

STEP GOAL:

Apply direct user-requested changes to the workflow, loading relevant standards and checking for non-compliance during editing.

MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):

Universal Rules:

  • 🛑 NEVER make changes without user approval
  • 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
  • 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not an autonomous editor
  • YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config {communication_language}

Step-Specific Rules:

  • 🎯 Focus on user-requested changes
  • 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make changes without approval
  • 💬 Check for non-compliance while editing
  • 📋 Load relevant standards for each change type

EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:

  • 🎯 Work through each requested change
  • 💾 Document each change in edit plan
  • 📖 Load appropriate standards for each change type
  • 🚫 IF non-compliance found: offer to fix before proceeding

CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:

  • Edit plan contains direct change goals
  • Focus: Apply user's requested changes
  • Must check for compliance issues during edits

MANDATORY SEQUENCE

CRITICAL: Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip or shortcut.

1. Read Edit Plan

Load the editPlan: Read {editPlan} to review direct change goals from step 2.

2. For Each Direct Change Goal

Work through each change systematically:

A. Identify Change Type and Load Standards

For workflow.md changes:

  • Load {architecture}

For step file changes:

  • Load {stepFileRules}
  • Load {stepTypePatterns}
  • Load {intentVsPrescriptive}

For frontmatter changes:

  • Load {frontmatterStandards}

For menu changes:

  • Load {menuHandlingStandards}

For output/template changes:

  • Load {outputFormatStandards}

For data file changes:

  • Load {csvDataFileStandards}

For workflow type changes:

  • Load {workflowTypeCriteria}

For discovery/input changes:

  • Load {inputDiscoveryStandards}

B. Load Target File and Check Compliance

Load the file to be edited and review against standards:

"Loading: {filename} Standard: {standard file loaded}

Checking file against standards before making your change..."

IF NON-COMPLIANCE FOUND:

"⚠️ Compliance Issue Detected

Before I apply your change, I noticed this file is not fully compliant with {standard}:

Issue: {describe the non-compliance}

This could cause: {explain impact}

Should I fix this compliance issue before applying your change?

  1. [F]ix first - Fix compliance, then apply your change
  2. [C]ontinue anyway - Apply your change without fixing
  3. [E]xplain more - More details about the issue

Menu Handling Logic:

  • IF F: Fix compliance first, then proceed to apply change
  • IF C: Document user accepted risk, proceed with change
  • IF E: Provide more details, then redisplay menu
  • IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu"

IF COMPLIANT:

"File is compliant. Proceeding with your change."

C. Present Current State and Proposed Change

"Current state of: {filename}

{show relevant section}

Your requested change: {summarize the change from edit plan}

Proposed modification: {show how the change will be made}

Should I apply this change?"

Wait for user approval.

D. Apply Change (If Approved)

Load the file, make the change:

**Applying change to: {filename}**

**Before:**
{show relevant section}

**After:**
{show modified section}

**Change applied.** ✅"

Update editPlan:

### Direct Changes Applied

**[{change type}]** {filename}
- ✅ Changed: {description}
- User approved: Yes
- Compliance check: Passed/Fixed/Accepted risk

3. Handle Common Change Patterns

Adding a New Step

  1. Load {stepFileRules}, {stepTypePatterns}, {intentVsPrescriptive}
  2. Check existing step numbering
  3. Determine appropriate step type
  4. Create step file with proper structure
  5. Update nextStepFile references in adjacent steps
  6. Verify menu handling compliance

Removing a Step

  1. Load {architecture}
  2. Check if step is referenced by other steps
  3. Update nextStepFile in previous step
  4. Confirm with user about impact
  5. Remove step file
  6. Verify no broken references

Modifying workflow.md

  1. Load {architecture}
  2. Check for progressive disclosure compliance (no step listings!)
  3. Update goal/role/routing as requested
  4. Ensure last section is routing
  5. Verify frontmatter completeness

Adding/Modifying Data Files

  1. Load {csvDataFileStandards}
  2. Check file size (warn if >500 lines)
  3. Verify CSV format if applicable
  4. Ensure proper headers
  5. Update step frontmatter references

Adding/Modifying Templates

  1. Load {outputFormatStandards}
  2. Determine template type
  3. Ensure variable consistency
  4. Update step frontmatter references

4. After All Changes Complete

Present summary:

"Direct Edit Summary:

Total Changes Requested: {count} Applied: {count} Skipped: {count} Modified: {count}

Compliance Issues Found During Editing: {count}

  • Fixed: {count}
  • User accepted risk: {count}

Files Modified:

  • {file1}
  • {file2}
  • etc."

5. Present MENU OPTIONS

Display: "Direct Edits Applied. Select an Option: [C] Continue"

Menu Handling Logic:

  • IF C: Update editPlan stepsCompleted, then load, read entirely, then execute {nextStepFile}
  • IF Any other: help user respond, then redisplay menu

CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE

ONLY WHEN all direct changes are applied (or documented) and user confirms, will you then load and read fully {nextStepFile} to execute.


🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS

SUCCESS:

  • All requested changes presented to user
  • Relevant standards loaded for each change
  • Compliance checked before each change
  • User approval obtained for each change
  • Non-compliance found and offered fix
  • Changes applied correctly
  • Edit plan updated

SYSTEM FAILURE:

  • Not loading relevant standards
  • Not checking compliance before editing
  • Making changes without user approval
  • Missing non-compliance issues
  • Not documenting changes

Master Rule: Load standards for each change type. Check compliance BEFORE applying changes. Offer to fix non-compliance when found.