e9e6fadb1d
- Fix ChatBubble to handle non-string content with String() wrapper - Fix API route to use generateText for non-streaming requests - Add @ai-sdk/openai-compatible for non-OpenAI providers (DeepSeek, etc.) - Use Chat Completions API instead of Responses API for compatible providers - Update ChatBubble tests and fix component exports to kebab-case - Remove stale PascalCase ChatBubble.tsx file
9.8 KiB
validationTarget, validationDate, inputDocuments, validationStepsCompleted, validationStatus, holisticQualityRating, overallStatus
| validationTarget | validationDate | inputDocuments | validationStepsCompleted | validationStatus | holisticQualityRating | overallStatus | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md | 2026-01-21 |
|
|
COMPLETE | 5/5 | Pass |
PRD Validation Report (Post-Edit Verification)
PRD Being Validated: /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md Validation Date: 2026-01-21
Input Documents
product-brief-Test01-2026-01-20.mdux_brainstorm_notes.mdux-design-specification.mdbrainstorming-session-2026-01-20.md
Validation Findings
[Findings will be appended as validation progresses]
Format Detection
PRD Structure:
- Executive Summary
- Success Criteria
- Product Scope
- User Journeys
- Domain-Specific Requirements
- Innovation & Novel Patterns
- Web App Specific Requirements
- Project Scoping & Phased Development
- Functional Requirements
- Non-Functional Requirements
BMAD Core Sections Present:
- Executive Summary: Present
- Success Criteria: Present
- Product Scope: Present
- User Journeys: Present
- Functional Requirements: Present
- Non-Functional Requirements: Present
Format Classification: BMAD Standard Core Sections Present: 6/6
Information Density Validation
Anti-Pattern Violations:
Conversational Filler: 0 occurrences
Wordy Phrases: 0 occurrences
Redundant Phrases: 0 occurrences
Total Violations: 0
Severity Assessment: Pass
Recommendation: PRD demonstrates good information density with minimal violations.
Product Brief Coverage
Product Brief: product-brief-Test01-2026-01-20.md
Coverage Map:
- Vision Statement: Fully Covered
- Target Users: Fully Covered
- Problem Statement: Fully Covered
- Key Features: Fully Covered
- Goals/Objectives: Fully Covered
- Differentiators: Fully Covered
Coverage Summary:
- Overall Coverage: 100%
- Critical Gaps: 0
- Moderate Gaps: 0
- Informational Gaps: 0
Recommendation: PRD provides excellent coverage of the Product Brief content.
Measurability Validation
Functional Requirements
Format Violations: 0 Subjective Adjectives Found: 0 Vague Quantifiers Found: 0 Implementation Leakage: 0 FR Violations Total: 0
Non-Functional Requirements
Missing Metrics: 0 Incomplete Template: 0 Missing Context: 0 NFR Violations Total: 0
Overall Assessment
Total Requirements: 18 (14 FR + 4 NFR) Total Violations: 0 Severity: Pass Recommendation: Requirements demonstrate excellent measurability.
Traceability Validation
Chain Validation
Executive Summary → Success Criteria: Intact Success Criteria → User Journeys: Intact User Journeys → Functional Requirements: Intact Scope → FR Alignment: Intact
Orphan Elements
Orphan Functional Requirements: 0 Unsupported Success Criteria: 0 User Journeys Without FRs: 0
Traceability Matrix
All FRs trace back to defined User Journeys or NFRs.
Total Traceability Issues: 0 Severity: Pass Recommendation: Traceability chain is intact.
Implementation Leakage Validation
Leakage by Category
Frontend Frameworks: 0 Backend Frameworks: 0 Databases: 0 Cloud Platforms: 0 Infrastructure: 0 Libraries: 0 Other Implementation Details: 0
Summary
Total Implementation Leakage Violations: 0 Severity: Pass Recommendation: No significant implementation leakage found.
Domain Compliance Validation
Domain: edtech Complexity: High (regulated)
Required Special Sections
Compliance & Regulatory: Present Educational Framework Alignment: Present Accessibility: Present
Compliance Matrix
| Requirement | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Data Privacy (Adult Learners) | Met | Detailed in Domain-Specific Requirements |
| Content Moderation | Met | Addressed for reputation safety |
| Educational Framework | Met | Bloom's Taxonomy alignment added |
| Accessibility | Met | WCAG 2.1 AA specified |
Summary
Required Sections Present: 3/3 Compliance Gaps: 0
Severity: Pass Recommendation: All required domain compliance sections are present and adequately documented.
Project-Type Compliance Validation
Project Type: web_app
Required Sections
User Journeys: Present UX/UI Requirements: Present (Web App Specific Requirements) Responsive Design: Present
Excluded Sections (Should Not Be Present)
None: 0 violations
Compliance Summary
Required Sections: 3/3 present Excluded Sections Present: 0 Compliance Score: 100% Severity: Pass Recommendation: All required web_app sections are present.
SMART Requirements Validation
Total Functional Requirements: 14
Scoring Summary
All scores ≥ 3: 100% (14/14) All scores ≥ 4: 100% (14/14) Overall Average Score: 5.0/5.0
Scoring Table
| FR # | Specific | Measurable | Attainable | Relevant | Traceable | Average | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR-01 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-02 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-03 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-04 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-05 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-06 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-07 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-08 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-09 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-11 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-12 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-13 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | |
| FR-14 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 |
Overall Assessment
Severity: Pass Recommendation: Functional Requirements demonstrate excellent SMART quality.
Holistic Quality Assessment
Document Flow & Coherence
Assessment: Excellent Strengths:
- Strong narrative flow from user pain (Venting) to solution (Legacy Log).
- Clear innovation logic (Dual-Agent Pipeline).
- Cohesive structure linking vision to specific functional requirements. Areas for Improvement:
- None significant.
Dual Audience Effectiveness
For Humans:
- Executive-friendly: Excellent (Clear Vision/Success metrics).
- Developer clarity: Excellent (Clean requirements, no leakage). For LLMs:
- Machine-readable: Excellent (Standard Markdown, clear sections).
- Epic readiness: High (Journeys map directly to Epics). Dual Audience Score: 5/5
BMAD PRD Principles Compliance
Information Density: Met Measurability: Met Traceability: Met Domain Awareness: Met Zero Anti-Patterns: Met Dual Audience: Met Markdown Format: Met Principles Met: 7/7
Overall Quality Rating
Rating: 5/5 - Excellent Scale: Exemplary, ready for production use.
Top 3 Improvements
- Validation Complete: Maintain high quality during implementation.
- UX Implementation: Ensure "Teacher" persona design matches the "Supportive" requirements.
- Architecture: Focus on Local-First architecture validity during design.
Summary
This PRD is: A polished, high-quality document that perfectly balances human readability with machine-actionable requirements. To make it great: Proceed to design and build.
Completeness Validation
Template Completeness
Template Variables Found: 0 No template variables remaining ✓
Content Completeness by Section
Executive Summary: Complete Success Criteria: Complete Product Scope: Complete User Journeys: Complete Functional Requirements: Complete Non-Functional Requirements: Complete
Section-Specific Completeness
Success Criteria Measurability: All measurable User Journeys Coverage: Yes covers all user types FRs Cover MVP Scope: Yes NFRs Have Specific Criteria: All
Frontmatter Completeness
stepsCompleted: Present classification: Present inputDocuments: Present date: Present Frontmatter Completeness: 4/4
Completeness Summary
Overall Completeness: 100% Critical Gaps: 0 Minor Gaps: 0 Severity: Pass Recommendation: PRD is complete with all required sections and content present.