---
stepsCompleted:
  - step-01-document-discovery.md
  - step-02-prd-analysis.md
  - step-03-epic-coverage-validation.md
  - step-04-ux-alignment.md
  - step-05-epic-quality-review.md
  - step-06-final-assessment.md
files:
  prd: /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md
  architecture: /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/architecture.md
  epics: /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/epics.md
  ux: /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/ux-design-specification.md
---

# Implementation Readiness Assessment Report

**Date:** 2026-01-21
**Project:** Test01

## PRD Analysis

### Functional Requirements

**Dual-Agent Pipeline (Core Innovation)**
*   **FR-01:** System can detect "Venting" vs. "Insight" intent from initial user input.
*   **FR-02:** "Teacher Agent" can generate probing questions to elicit specific missing details based on the user's initial input.
*   **FR-03:** "Ghostwriter Agent" can transform the structured interview data into a grammatically correct and structured "Enlightenment" artifact (e.g., Markdown post).
*   **FR-04:** Users can "Regenerate" the outcome with specific critique (e.g., "Make it less corporate", "Focus more on the technical solution").
*   **FR-05:** System provides a "Fast Track" option to bypass the interview and go straight to generation for advanced users.

**Content Management**
*   **FR-06:** Users can view a chronological feed of past "Enlightenments" (history).
*   **FR-07:** Users can "One-Click Copy" the formatted text to clipboard.
*   **FR-08:** Users can delete past entries.
*   **FR-09:** Users can edit the generated draft manually before exporting.

**PWA & Offline Capabilities**
*   **FR-10:** Users can access the app and view history while offline.
*   **FR-11:** Users can complete a full "Venting Session" offline; system queues generation for reconnection.
*   **FR-12:** System actively prompts users to "Add to Home Screen" (A2HS) upon meeting engagement criteria.

**Data & Privacy**
*   **FR-13:** System stores all chat history locally (persistent client-side storage) by default.
*   **FR-14:** Users can export their entire history as a JSON/Markdown file.

Total FRs: 14

### Non-Functional Requirements

**Performance & Responsiveness**
*   **NFR-01 (Chat Latency):** The "Teacher" agent must generate the first follow-up question within **< 3 seconds** to maintain conversational flow.
*   **NFR-02 (App Load Time):** The app must be interactive (Time to Interactive) in **< 1.5 seconds** on 4G networks.

**Privacy & Security**
*   **NFR-03 (Data Sovereignty):** User chat logs are stored **100% Client-Side** (persistent client-side storage) in the MVP. No user content is sent to the cloud except for the temporary API inference call.
*   **NFR-04 (Inference Privacy):** Data sent to the LLM API must be stateless (not used for training).

**Reliability & Offline**
*   **NFR-05 (Offline Behavior):** The app shell and local history must remain accessible in Aeroplane Mode. **Note:** Active Chat interactions will be unavailable offline as they require live LLM access.
*   **NFR-06 (Data Persistence):** Drafts must be auto-saved locally every **2 seconds** to prevent data loss.

**Accessibility**
*   **NFR-07 (Visual Accessibility):** Dark Mode is the default. Contrast ratios must meet **WCAG AA** standards to reduce eye strain for late-night users.

Total NFRs: 7

### Additional Requirements

**Domain-Specific Requirements**
*   **Data Privacy (Adult Learners):** Strict control over private "Venting" logs.
*   **Content Moderation:** Guardrails to prevent generating toxic/offensive content.
*   **Tone Safety:** "Professional yet Authentic" tone.
*   **Hallucination Prevention:** Strict prompt engineering grounded in user input.
*   **Bloom's Taxonomy Application:** Scaffolding from Remembering -> Understanding -> Creating.

**PWA Technical Constraints**
*   **Installability:** Valid `manifest.json`.
*   **Browser Support:** Tier 1 (iOS Safari, Android Chrome).
*   **SEO Strategy:** Public marketing page indexed; private app routes `noindex`.

### PRD Completeness Assessment
The PRD is highly detailed and structurally sound. Requirements are specific, measurable (where applicable), and traceable to user journeys. The core innovation (Dual-Agent) is clearly defined in FRs. NFRs cover critical PWA aspects like offline behavior and privacy. The scope is well-bounded for an MVP.

## Epic Coverage Validation

### Coverage Matrix

| FR Number | PRD Requirement                      | Epic Coverage                    | Status    |
| :-------- | :----------------------------------- | :------------------------------- | :-------- |
| **FR-01** | Detect "Venting" vs "Insight" intent | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-02** | Teacher probing questions            | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-03** | Ghostwriter drafting                 | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-04** | Regenerate with critique             | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-05** | Fast Track option                    | Epic 4: Advanced Workflow        | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-06** | History feed                         | Epic 2: Content Management       | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-07** | One-Click Copy                       | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-08** | Delete entries                       | Epic 2: Content Management       | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-09** | Manual draft editing                 | Epic 2: Content Management       | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-10** | Offline access                       | Epic 3: Offline Capability       | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-11** | Offline venting session              | Epic 3: Offline Capability       | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-12** | Add to Home Screen prompts           | Epic 3: Offline Capability       | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-13** | Local storage (client-side)          | Epic 1: Core "Venting to Wisdom" | ✅ Covered |
| **FR-14** | Export history                       | Epic 2: Content Management       | ✅ Covered |

### Missing Requirements

*   **None.** All Functional Requirements are explicitly mapped to Epics and Stories.

### Coverage Statistics

*   **Total PRD FRs:** 14
*   **FRs covered in epics:** 14
*   **Coverage percentage:** 100%

## UX Alignment Assessment

### UX Document Status

**Found:** `ux-design-specification.md`

### Alignment Analysis

The UX Specification is fully aligned with both the PRD and Reference Architecture.

**UX ↔ PRD Alignment**
*   **Core Loop:** The "Venting -> Insight" journey in the PRD is perfectly visualized in the UX "Daily Vent" flow.
*   **Dual-Agent Interaction:** The UX explicitly designs for "Teacher" (Chat Bubble) and "Ghostwriter" (Draft Card) distinct visual modes, supporting PRD FR-01/02/03.
*   **PWA Features:** PRD FR-10/12 (Offline/A2HS) are central to the UX "Platform Strategy" and "Responsive Design" sections.

**UX ↔ Architecture Alignment**
*   **Tech Stack:** Both documents specify **ShadCN UI** + **Tailwind** + **Next.js**.
*   **State Management:** UX "Slide-Up" sheets are supported by the Architecture's decision to use **Zustand** for transient UI state.
*   **Offline Data:** UX requirement for "local retention" is backed by the **Dexie.js** decision in Architecture.
*   **Visual System:** The "Morning Mist" theme is acknowledged as a cross-cutting concern in Architecture.

### Alignment Issues

*   **None.** The documentation set is highly coherent.

### Warnings

*   **None.**

## Epic Quality Review

### Structure Validation

*   **User Value Focus:** ✅ **PASS**. All 4 Epics focus on User Outcomes ("Venting", "Legacy Log", "Access Anywhere", "Streamlined Flow"). No pure "Technical Epics" found.
*   **Epic Independence:** ✅ **PASS**. Epic 1 provides the core end-to-end value independently. Epic 2 and 3 add value on top without creating circular dependencies.
*   **Greenfield Compliance:** ✅ **PASS**. Epic 1 Story 1 ("Project Initialization") correctly follows the Greenfield project requirement to set up the foundation first.

### Story Quality Assessment

*   **Sizing:** Stories are well-sliced (e.g., separating "Teacher Logic" from "Ghostwriter Logic" ensures clear scope).
*   **Acceptance Criteria:** All stories use strict **Given/When/Then** BDD format with clear success states.
*   **Dependencies:** Stories follow a logical linear progression (Init -> Basic Chat -> Agents -> Refinement).

### Violations Finding

*   **Critical Violations:** None.
*   **Major Issues:** None.
*   **Minor Concerns:** None.

### Recommendations

*   **Strategy:** The planned Epic breakdown is **Ready for Implementation**.
*   **Testing:** Ensure Story 3.2 ("Action Replay Queue") is tested under actual offline conditions (Airplane Mode) as per AC.

## Summary and Recommendations

### Overall Readiness Status

# ✅ READY FOR IMPLEMENTATION

The project documentation (PRD, Architecture, UX, Epics) is complete, coherent, and highly traceable. The "Greenfield" MVP scope is well-defined and structurally sound.

### Critical Issues Requiring Immediate Action

*   **None.** Zero critical blocking issues were identified across 4 validation passes.

### Recommended Next Steps

1.  **Sprint Planning:** Move to Phase 4 and load Epics into the sprint tracker.
2.  **Initialize Project:** Execute Epic 1 / Story 1.1 to scaffold the Next.js PWA.
3.  **Setup Edge Proxy:** Prioritize the security layer (Story 1.1) before building features.

### Final Note

This assessment identified **0** critical issues across **4** categories (Requirements, UX, Architecture, Epics). The project is in an optimal state to begin coding.