---
validationTarget: '/home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md'
validationDate: '2026-01-21'
inputDocuments:
  - file:///home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/product-brief-Test01-2026-01-20.md
  - file:///home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/ux_brainstorm_notes.md
  - file:///home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/ux-design-specification.md
  - file:///home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/analysis/brainstorming-session-2026-01-20.md
validationStepsCompleted: ['step-v-01-discovery', 'step-v-02-format-detection', 'step-v-03-density-validation', 'step-v-04-brief-coverage-validation', 'step-v-05-measurability-validation', 'step-v-06-traceability-validation', 'step-v-07-implementation-leakage-validation', 'step-v-08-domain-compliance-validation', 'step-v-09-project-type-validation', 'step-v-10-smart-validation', 'step-v-11-holistic-quality-validation', 'step-v-12-completeness-validation']
validationStatus: COMPLETE
holisticQualityRating: '5/5'
overallStatus: 'Pass'
---

# PRD Validation Report (Post-Edit Verification)

**PRD Being Validated:** /home/maximilienmao/Projects/Test01/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md
**Validation Date:** 2026-01-21

## Input Documents

- `product-brief-Test01-2026-01-20.md`
- `ux_brainstorm_notes.md`
- `ux-design-specification.md`
- `brainstorming-session-2026-01-20.md`

## Validation Findings

[Findings will be appended as validation progresses]

### Format Detection

**PRD Structure:**
- Executive Summary
- Success Criteria
- Product Scope
- User Journeys
- Domain-Specific Requirements
- Innovation & Novel Patterns
- Web App Specific Requirements
- Project Scoping & Phased Development
- Functional Requirements
- Non-Functional Requirements

**BMAD Core Sections Present:**
- Executive Summary: Present
- Success Criteria: Present
- Product Scope: Present
- User Journeys: Present
- Functional Requirements: Present
- Non-Functional Requirements: Present

**Format Classification:** BMAD Standard
**Core Sections Present:** 6/6

### Information Density Validation

**Anti-Pattern Violations:**

**Conversational Filler:** 0 occurrences

**Wordy Phrases:** 0 occurrences

**Redundant Phrases:** 0 occurrences

**Total Violations:** 0

**Severity Assessment:** Pass

**Recommendation:**
PRD demonstrates good information density with minimal violations.

## Product Brief Coverage

**Product Brief:** product-brief-Test01-2026-01-20.md

**Coverage Map:**
- **Vision Statement:** Fully Covered
- **Target Users:** Fully Covered
- **Problem Statement:** Fully Covered
- **Key Features:** Fully Covered
- **Goals/Objectives:** Fully Covered
- **Differentiators:** Fully Covered

**Coverage Summary:**
- **Overall Coverage:** 100%
- **Critical Gaps:** 0
- **Moderate Gaps:** 0
- **Informational Gaps:** 0

**Recommendation:**
PRD provides excellent coverage of the Product Brief content.

## Measurability Validation

### Functional Requirements
**Format Violations:** 0
**Subjective Adjectives Found:** 0
**Vague Quantifiers Found:** 0
**Implementation Leakage:** 0
**FR Violations Total:** 0

### Non-Functional Requirements
**Missing Metrics:** 0
**Incomplete Template:** 0
**Missing Context:** 0
**NFR Violations Total:** 0

### Overall Assessment
**Total Requirements:** 18 (14 FR + 4 NFR)
**Total Violations:** 0
**Severity:** Pass
**Recommendation:** Requirements demonstrate excellent measurability.

## Traceability Validation

### Chain Validation
**Executive Summary → Success Criteria:** Intact
**Success Criteria → User Journeys:** Intact
**User Journeys → Functional Requirements:** Intact
**Scope → FR Alignment:** Intact

### Orphan Elements
**Orphan Functional Requirements:** 0
**Unsupported Success Criteria:** 0
**User Journeys Without FRs:** 0

### Traceability Matrix
All FRs trace back to defined User Journeys or NFRs.

**Total Traceability Issues:** 0
**Severity:** Pass
**Recommendation:** Traceability chain is intact.

## Implementation Leakage Validation

### Leakage by Category
**Frontend Frameworks:** 0
**Backend Frameworks:** 0
**Databases:** 0
**Cloud Platforms:** 0
**Infrastructure:** 0
**Libraries:** 0
**Other Implementation Details:** 0

### Summary
**Total Implementation Leakage Violations:** 0
**Severity:** Pass
**Recommendation:** No significant implementation leakage found.

## Domain Compliance Validation

**Domain:** edtech
**Complexity:** High (regulated)

### Required Special Sections

**Compliance & Regulatory:** Present
**Educational Framework Alignment:** Present
**Accessibility:** Present

### Compliance Matrix

| Requirement                   | Status | Notes                                    |
| ----------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------- |
| Data Privacy (Adult Learners) | Met    | Detailed in Domain-Specific Requirements |
| Content Moderation            | Met    | Addressed for reputation safety          |
| Educational Framework         | Met    | Bloom's Taxonomy alignment added         |
| Accessibility                 | Met    | WCAG 2.1 AA specified                    |

### Summary

**Required Sections Present:** 3/3
**Compliance Gaps:** 0

**Severity:** Pass
**Recommendation:** All required domain compliance sections are present and adequately documented.

## Project-Type Compliance Validation

**Project Type:** web_app

### Required Sections
**User Journeys:** Present
**UX/UI Requirements:** Present (Web App Specific Requirements)
**Responsive Design:** Present

### Excluded Sections (Should Not Be Present)
**None:** 0 violations

### Compliance Summary
**Required Sections:** 3/3 present
**Excluded Sections Present:** 0
**Compliance Score:** 100%
**Severity:** Pass
**Recommendation:** All required web_app sections are present.

## SMART Requirements Validation

**Total Functional Requirements:** 14

### Scoring Summary
**All scores ≥ 3:** 100% (14/14)
**All scores ≥ 4:** 100% (14/14)
**Overall Average Score:** 5.0/5.0

### Scoring Table

| FR #  | Specific | Measurable | Attainable | Relevant | Traceable | Average | Flag |
| ----- | -------- | ---------- | ---------- | -------- | --------- | ------- | ---- |
| FR-01 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-02 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-03 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-04 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-05 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-06 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-07 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-08 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-09 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-10 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-11 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-12 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-13 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |
| FR-14 | 5        | 5          | 5          | 5        | 5         | 5.0     |      |

### Overall Assessment
**Severity:** Pass
**Recommendation:** Functional Requirements demonstrate excellent SMART quality.

## Holistic Quality Assessment

### Document Flow & Coherence
**Assessment:** Excellent
**Strengths:**
- Strong narrative flow from user pain (Venting) to solution (Legacy Log).
- Clear innovation logic (Dual-Agent Pipeline).
- Cohesive structure linking vision to specific functional requirements.
**Areas for Improvement:**
- None significant.

### Dual Audience Effectiveness
**For Humans:**
- Executive-friendly: Excellent (Clear Vision/Success metrics).
- Developer clarity: Excellent (Clean requirements, no leakage).
**For LLMs:**
- Machine-readable: Excellent (Standard Markdown, clear sections).
- Epic readiness: High (Journeys map directly to Epics).
**Dual Audience Score:** 5/5

### BMAD PRD Principles Compliance
**Information Density:** Met
**Measurability:** Met
**Traceability:** Met
**Domain Awareness:** Met
**Zero Anti-Patterns:** Met
**Dual Audience:** Met
**Markdown Format:** Met
**Principles Met:** 7/7

### Overall Quality Rating
**Rating:** 5/5 - Excellent
**Scale:** Exemplary, ready for production use.

### Top 3 Improvements
1. **Validation Complete:** Maintain high quality during implementation.
2. **UX Implementation:** Ensure "Teacher" persona design matches the "Supportive" requirements.
3. **Architecture:** Focus on Local-First architecture validity during design.

### Summary
**This PRD is:** A polished, high-quality document that perfectly balances human readability with machine-actionable requirements.
**To make it great:** Proceed to design and build.

## Completeness Validation

### Template Completeness
**Template Variables Found:** 0
No template variables remaining ✓

### Content Completeness by Section
**Executive Summary:** Complete
**Success Criteria:** Complete
**Product Scope:** Complete
**User Journeys:** Complete
**Functional Requirements:** Complete
**Non-Functional Requirements:** Complete

### Section-Specific Completeness
**Success Criteria Measurability:** All measurable
**User Journeys Coverage:** Yes covers all user types
**FRs Cover MVP Scope:** Yes
**NFRs Have Specific Criteria:** All

### Frontmatter Completeness
**stepsCompleted:** Present
**classification:** Present
**inputDocuments:** Present
**date:** Present
**Frontmatter Completeness:** 4/4

### Completeness Summary
**Overall Completeness:** 100%
**Critical Gaps:** 0
**Minor Gaps:** 0
**Severity:** Pass
**Recommendation:** PRD is complete with all required sections and content present.