Brachnha/brachnha-insight
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: ChatBubble crash and DeepSeek API compatibility

Browse Source 
- Fix ChatBubble to handle non-string content with String() wrapper
- Fix API route to use generateText for non-streaming requests
- Add @ai-sdk/openai-compatible for non-OpenAI providers (DeepSeek, etc.)
- Use Chat Completions API instead of Responses API for compatible providers
- Update ChatBubble tests and fix component exports to kebab-case
- Remove stale PascalCase ChatBubble.tsx file
This commit is contained in:
Max
2026-01-26 16:55:05 +07:00
parent 6b113e0392
commit e9e6fadb1d
544 changed files with 113077 additions and 427 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

51
_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/methods.csv Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
num,category,method_name,description,output_pattern
1,collaboration,Stakeholder Round Table,Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests,perspectives → synthesis → alignment
2,collaboration,Expert Panel Review,Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed,expert views → consensus → recommendations
3,collaboration,Debate Club Showdown,Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground,thesis → antithesis → synthesis
4,collaboration,User Persona Focus Group,Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs,reactions → concerns → priorities
5,collaboration,Time Traveler Council,Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures,past wisdom → present choice → future impact
6,collaboration,Cross-Functional War Room,Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability,constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution
7,collaboration,Mentor and Apprentice,Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching,explanation → questions → deeper understanding
8,collaboration,Good Cop Bad Cop,Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address,encouragement → criticism → balanced view
9,collaboration,Improv Yes-And,Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building,idea → build → build → surprising result
10,collaboration,Customer Support Theater,Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps,complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention
11,advanced,Tree of Thoughts,Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches,paths → evaluation → selection
12,advanced,Graph of Thoughts,Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns,nodes → connections → patterns
13,advanced,Thread of Thought,Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency,context → thread → synthesis
14,advanced,Self-Consistency Validation,Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters,approaches → comparison → consensus
15,advanced,Meta-Prompting Analysis,Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving,current → analysis → optimization
16,advanced,Reasoning via Planning,Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making,model → planning → strategy
17,competitive,Red Team vs Blue Team,Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions,defense → attack → hardening
18,competitive,Shark Tank Pitch,Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition,pitch → challenges → refinement
19,competitive,Code Review Gauntlet,Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices,reviews → debates → standards
20,technical,Architecture Decision Records,Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented,options → trade-offs → decision → rationale
21,technical,Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved,Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels,simple → detailed → technical → aha
22,technical,Algorithm Olympics,Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison,implementations → benchmarks → winner
23,technical,Security Audit Personas,Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles,vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance
24,technical,Performance Profiler Panel,Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack,symptoms → analysis → optimizations
25,creative,SCAMPER Method,Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation,S→C→A→M→P→E→R
26,creative,Reverse Engineering,Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints,end state → steps backward → path forward
27,creative,What If Scenarios,Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration,scenarios → implications → insights
28,creative,Random Input Stimulus,Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking,random word → associations → novel ideas
29,creative,Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm,Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration,contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise
30,creative,Genre Mashup,Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination,domain A + domain B → hybrid insights
31,research,Literature Review Personas,Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality,sources → critiques → synthesis
32,research,Thesis Defense Simulation,Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions,thesis → challenges → defense → refinements
33,research,Comparative Analysis Matrix,Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring,options → criteria → scores → recommendation
34,risk,Pre-mortem Analysis,Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches,failure scenario → causes → prevention
35,risk,Failure Mode Analysis,Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems,components → failures → prevention
36,risk,Challenge from Critical Perspective,Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink,assumptions → challenges → strengthening
37,risk,Identify Potential Risks,Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation,categories → risks → mitigations
38,risk,Chaos Monkey Scenarios,Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully,break → observe → harden
39,core,First Principles Analysis,Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems,assumptions → truths → new approach
40,core,5 Whys Deep Dive,Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures,why chain → root cause → solution
41,core,Socratic Questioning,Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery,questions → revelations → understanding
42,core,Critique and Refine,Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts,strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined
43,core,Explain Reasoning,Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency,steps → logic → conclusion
44,core,Expand or Contract for Audience,Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities,audience → adjustments → refined content
45,learning,Feynman Technique,Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding,complex → simple → gaps → mastery
46,learning,Active Recall Testing,Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps,test → gaps → reinforcement
47,philosophical,Occam's Razor Application,Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging,options → simplification → selection
48,philosophical,Trolley Problem Variations,Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions,dilemma → analysis → decision
49,retrospective,Hindsight Reflection,Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews,future view → insights → application
50,retrospective,Lessons Learned Extraction,Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement,experience → lessons → actions
1 num category method_name description output_pattern
2 1 collaboration Stakeholder Round Table Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests perspectives → synthesis → alignment
3 2 collaboration Expert Panel Review Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed expert views → consensus → recommendations
4 3 collaboration Debate Club Showdown Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground thesis → antithesis → synthesis
5 4 collaboration User Persona Focus Group Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs reactions → concerns → priorities
6 5 collaboration Time Traveler Council Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures past wisdom → present choice → future impact
7 6 collaboration Cross-Functional War Room Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution
8 7 collaboration Mentor and Apprentice Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching explanation → questions → deeper understanding
9 8 collaboration Good Cop Bad Cop Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address encouragement → criticism → balanced view
10 9 collaboration Improv Yes-And Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building idea → build → build → surprising result
11 10 collaboration Customer Support Theater Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention
12 11 advanced Tree of Thoughts Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches paths → evaluation → selection
13 12 advanced Graph of Thoughts Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns nodes → connections → patterns
14 13 advanced Thread of Thought Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency context → thread → synthesis
15 14 advanced Self-Consistency Validation Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters approaches → comparison → consensus
16 15 advanced Meta-Prompting Analysis Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving current → analysis → optimization
17 16 advanced Reasoning via Planning Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making model → planning → strategy
18 17 competitive Red Team vs Blue Team Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions defense → attack → hardening
19 18 competitive Shark Tank Pitch Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition pitch → challenges → refinement
20 19 competitive Code Review Gauntlet Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices reviews → debates → standards
21 20 technical Architecture Decision Records Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented options → trade-offs → decision → rationale
22 21 technical Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels simple → detailed → technical → aha
23 22 technical Algorithm Olympics Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison implementations → benchmarks → winner
24 23 technical Security Audit Personas Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance
25 24 technical Performance Profiler Panel Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack symptoms → analysis → optimizations
26 25 creative SCAMPER Method Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation S→C→A→M→P→E→R
27 26 creative Reverse Engineering Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints end state → steps backward → path forward
28 27 creative What If Scenarios Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration scenarios → implications → insights
29 28 creative Random Input Stimulus Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking random word → associations → novel ideas
30 29 creative Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise
31 30 creative Genre Mashup Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination domain A + domain B → hybrid insights
32 31 research Literature Review Personas Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality sources → critiques → synthesis
33 32 research Thesis Defense Simulation Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions thesis → challenges → defense → refinements
34 33 research Comparative Analysis Matrix Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring options → criteria → scores → recommendation
35 34 risk Pre-mortem Analysis Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches failure scenario → causes → prevention
36 35 risk Failure Mode Analysis Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems components → failures → prevention
37 36 risk Challenge from Critical Perspective Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink assumptions → challenges → strengthening
38 37 risk Identify Potential Risks Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation categories → risks → mitigations
39 38 risk Chaos Monkey Scenarios Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully break → observe → harden
40 39 core First Principles Analysis Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems assumptions → truths → new approach
41 40 core 5 Whys Deep Dive Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures why chain → root cause → solution
42 41 core Socratic Questioning Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery questions → revelations → understanding
43 42 core Critique and Refine Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined
44 43 core Explain Reasoning Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency steps → logic → conclusion
45 44 core Expand or Contract for Audience Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities audience → adjustments → refined content
46 45 learning Feynman Technique Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding complex → simple → gaps → mastery
47 46 learning Active Recall Testing Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps test → gaps → reinforcement
48 47 philosophical Occam's Razor Application Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging options → simplification → selection
49 48 philosophical Trolley Problem Variations Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions dilemma → analysis → decision
50 49 retrospective Hindsight Reflection Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews future view → insights → application
51 50 retrospective Lessons Learned Extraction Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement experience → lessons → actions

117
_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
<task id="_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml" name="Advanced Elicitation" standalone="true"
methods="{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/methods.csv"
agent-party="{project-root}/_bmad/_config/agent-manifest.csv">
<llm critical="true">
<i>MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER</i>
<i>DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence</i>
<i>HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met</i>
<i>Each action xml tag within step xml tag is a REQUIRED action to complete that step</i>
<i>Sections outside flow (validation, output, critical-context) provide essential context - review and apply throughout execution</i>
<i>YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the `communication_language`</i>
</llm>
<integration description="When called from workflow">
<desc>When called during template workflow processing:</desc>
<i>1. Receive or review the current section content that was just generated or</i>
<i>2. Apply elicitation methods iteratively to enhance that specific content</i>
<i>3. Return the enhanced version back when user selects 'x' to proceed and return back</i>
<i>4. The enhanced content replaces the original section content in the output document</i>
</integration>
<flow>
<step n="1" title="Method Registry Loading">
<action>Load and read {{methods}} and {{agent-party}}</action>
<csv-structure>
<i>category: Method grouping (core, structural, risk, etc.)</i>
<i>method_name: Display name for the method</i>
<i>description: Rich explanation of what the method does, when to use it, and why it's valuable</i>
<i>output_pattern: Flexible flow guide using → arrows (e.g., "analysis → insights → action")</i>
</csv-structure>
<context-analysis>
<i>Use conversation history</i>
<i>Analyze: content type, complexity, stakeholder needs, risk level, and creative potential</i>
</context-analysis>
<smart-selection>
<i>1. Analyze context: Content type, complexity, stakeholder needs, risk level, creative potential</i>
<i>2. Parse descriptions: Understand each method's purpose from the rich descriptions in CSV</i>
<i>3. Select 5 methods: Choose methods that best match the context based on their descriptions</i>
<i>4. Balance approach: Include mix of foundational and specialized techniques as appropriate</i>
</smart-selection>
</step>
<step n="2" title="Present Options and Handle Responses">
<format>
**Advanced Elicitation Options (If you launched Party Mode, they will participate randomly)**
Choose a number (1-5), [r] to Reshuffle, [a] List All, or [x] to Proceed:
1. [Method Name]
2. [Method Name]
3. [Method Name]
4. [Method Name]
5. [Method Name]
r. Reshuffle the list with 5 new options
a. List all methods with descriptions
x. Proceed / No Further Actions
</format>
<response-handling>
<case n="1-5">
<i>Execute the selected method using its description from the CSV</i>
<i>Adapt the method's complexity and output format based on the current context</i>
<i>Apply the method creatively to the current section content being enhanced</i>
<i>Display the enhanced version showing what the method revealed or improved</i>
<i>CRITICAL: Ask the user if they would like to apply the changes to the doc (y/n/other) and HALT to await response.</i>
<i>CRITICAL: ONLY if Yes, apply the changes. IF No, discard your memory of the proposed changes. If any other reply, try best to
follow the instructions given by the user.</i>
<i>CRITICAL: Re-present the same 1-5,r,x prompt to allow additional elicitations</i>
</case>
<case n="r">
<i>Select 5 random methods from advanced-elicitation-methods.csv, present new list with same prompt format</i>
<i>When selecting, try to think and pick a diverse set of methods covering different categories and approaches, with 1 and 2 being
potentially the most useful for the document or section being discovered</i>
</case>
<case n="x">
<i>Complete elicitation and proceed</i>
<i>Return the fully enhanced content back to create-doc.md</i>
<i>The enhanced content becomes the final version for that section</i>
<i>Signal completion back to create-doc.md to continue with next section</i>
</case>
<case n="a">
<i>List all methods with their descriptions from the CSV in a compact table</i>
<i>Allow user to select any method by name or number from the full list</i>
<i>After selection, execute the method as described in the n="1-5" case above</i>
</case>
<case n="direct-feedback">
<i>Apply changes to current section content and re-present choices</i>
</case>
<case n="multiple-numbers">
<i>Execute methods in sequence on the content, then re-offer choices</i>
</case>
</response-handling>
</step>
<step n="3" title="Execution Guidelines">
<i>Method execution: Use the description from CSV to understand and apply each method</i>
<i>Output pattern: Use the pattern as a flexible guide (e.g., "paths → evaluation → selection")</i>
<i>Dynamic adaptation: Adjust complexity based on content needs (simple to sophisticated)</i>
<i>Creative application: Interpret methods flexibly based on context while maintaining pattern consistency</i>
<i>Focus on actionable insights</i>
<i>Stay relevant: Tie elicitation to specific content being analyzed (the current section from the document being created unless user
indicates otherwise)</i>
<i>Identify personas: For single or multi-persona methods, clearly identify viewpoints, and use party members if available in memory
already</i>
<i>Critical loop behavior: Always re-offer the 1-5,r,a,x choices after each method execution</i>
<i>Continue until user selects 'x' to proceed with enhanced content, confirm or ask the user what should be accepted from the session</i>
<i>Each method application builds upon previous enhancements</i>
<i>Content preservation: Track all enhancements made during elicitation</i>
<i>Iterative enhancement: Each selected method (1-5) should:</i>
<i> 1. Apply to the current enhanced version of the content</i>
<i> 2. Show the improvements made</i>
<i> 3. Return to the prompt for additional elicitations or completion</i>
</step>
</flow>
</task>