Ignore and untrack BMad directories

This commit is contained in:
Max
2026-01-26 15:49:36 +07:00
parent 7b732372e3
commit 6b113e0392
525 changed files with 2 additions and 112645 deletions

View File

@@ -1,247 +0,0 @@
---
name: 'step-e-01-discovery'
description: 'Discovery & Understanding - Understand what user wants to edit and detect PRD format'
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
altStepFile: './step-e-01b-legacy-conversion.md'
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/src/modules/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
---
# Step E-1: Discovery & Understanding
## STEP GOAL:
Understand what the user wants to edit in the PRD, detect PRD format/type, check for validation report guidance, and route appropriately.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring analytical expertise and improvement guidance
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and edit requirements
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on discovering user intent and PRD format
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make any edits yet
- 💬 Approach: Inquisitive and analytical, understanding before acting
- 🚪 This is a branch step - may route to legacy conversion
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Discover user's edit requirements
- 🎯 Auto-detect validation reports in PRD folder (use as guide)
- 🎯 Load validation report if provided (use as guide)
- 🎯 Detect PRD format (BMAD/legacy)
- 🎯 Route appropriately based on format
- 💾 Document discoveries for next step
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without understanding requirements
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: PRD file to edit, optional validation report, auto-detected validation reports
- Focus: User intent discovery and format detection only
- Limits: Don't edit yet, don't validate yet
- Dependencies: None - this is first edit step
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
### 1. Load PRD Purpose Standards
Load and read the complete file at:
`{prdPurpose}` (data/prd-purpose.md)
This file defines what makes a great BMAD PRD. Internalize this understanding - it will guide improvement recommendations.
### 2. Discover PRD to Edit
"**PRD Edit Workflow**
Which PRD would you like to edit?
Please provide the path to the PRD file you want to edit."
**Wait for user to provide PRD path.**
### 3. Validate PRD Exists and Load
Once PRD path is provided:
- Check if PRD file exists at specified path
- If not found: "I cannot find a PRD at that path. Please check the path and try again."
- If found: Load the complete PRD file including frontmatter
### 4. Check for Existing Validation Report
**Check if validation report exists in the PRD folder:**
```bash
# Look for most recent validation report in the PRD folder
ls -t {prd_folder_path}/validation-report-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1
```
**If validation report found:**
Display:
"**📋 Found Validation Report**
I found a validation report from {validation_date} in the PRD folder.
This report contains findings from previous validation checks and can help guide our edits to fix known issues.
**Would you like to:**
- **[U] Use validation report** - Load it to guide and prioritize edits
- **[S] Skip** - Proceed with manual edit discovery"
**Wait for user input.**
**IF U (Use validation report):**
- Load the validation report file
- Extract findings, issues, and improvement suggestions
- Note: "Validation report loaded - will use it to guide prioritized improvements"
- Continue to step 5
**IF S (Skip) or no validation report found:**
- Note: "Proceeding with manual edit discovery"
- Continue to step 5
**If no validation report found:**
- Note: "No validation report found in PRD folder"
- Continue to step 5 without asking user
### 5. Ask About Validation Report
"**Do you have a validation report to guide edits?**
If you've run the validation workflow on this PRD, I can use that report to guide improvements and prioritize changes.
Validation report path (or type 'none'):"
**Wait for user input.**
**If validation report path provided:**
- Load the validation report
- Extract findings, severity, improvement suggestions
- Note: "Validation report loaded - will use it to guide prioritized improvements"
**If no validation report:**
- Note: "Proceeding with manual edit discovery"
- Continue to step 6
### 6. Discover Edit Requirements
"**What would you like to edit in this PRD?**
Please describe the changes you want to make. For example:
- Fix specific issues (information density, implementation leakage, etc.)
- Add missing sections or content
- Improve structure and flow
- Convert to BMAD format (if legacy PRD)
- General improvements
- Other changes
**Describe your edit goals:**"
**Wait for user to describe their requirements.**
### 7. Detect PRD Format
Analyze the loaded PRD:
**Extract all ## Level 2 headers** from PRD
**Check for BMAD PRD core sections:**
1. Executive Summary
2. Success Criteria
3. Product Scope
4. User Journeys
5. Functional Requirements
6. Non-Functional Requirements
**Classify format:**
- **BMAD Standard:** 5-6 core sections present
- **BMAD Variant:** 3-4 core sections present, generally follows BMAD patterns
- **Legacy (Non-Standard):** Fewer than 3 core sections, does not follow BMAD structure
### 8. Route Based on Format and Context
**IF validation report provided OR PRD is BMAD Standard/Variant:**
Display: "**Edit Requirements Understood**
**PRD Format:** {classification}
{If validation report: "**Validation Guide:** Yes - will use validation report findings"}
**Edit Goals:** {summary of user's requirements}
**Proceeding to deep review and analysis...**"
Load and execute next step (step-e-02-review.md)
**IF PRD is Legacy (Non-Standard) AND no validation report:**
Display: "**Format Detected:** Legacy PRD
This PRD does not follow BMAD standard structure (only {count}/6 core sections present).
**Your edit goals:** {user's requirements}
**How would you like to proceed?**"
Present MENU OPTIONS below for user selection
### 9. Present MENU OPTIONS (Legacy PRDs Only)
**[C] Convert to BMAD Format** - Convert PRD to BMAD standard structure, then apply your edits
**[E] Edit As-Is** - Apply your edits without converting the format
**[X] Exit** - Exit and review conversion options
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
- Only proceed based on user selection
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- IF C (Convert): Load, read entire file, then execute {altStepFile} (step-e-01b-legacy-conversion.md)
- IF E (Edit As-Is): Display "Proceeding with edits..." then load next step
- IF X (Exit): Display summary and exit
- IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- User's edit requirements clearly understood
- Auto-detected validation reports loaded and analyzed (when found)
- Manual validation report loaded and analyzed (if provided)
- PRD format detected correctly
- BMAD PRDs proceed directly to review step
- Legacy PRDs pause and present conversion options
- User can choose conversion path or edit as-is
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Not discovering user's edit requirements
- Not auto-detecting validation reports in PRD folder
- Not loading validation report when provided (auto or manual)
- Missing format detection
- Not pausing for legacy PRDs without guidance
- Auto-proceeding without understanding intent
**Master Rule:** Understand before editing. Detect format early so we can guide users appropriately. Auto-detect and use validation reports for prioritized improvements.

View File

@@ -1,208 +0,0 @@
---
name: 'step-e-01b-legacy-conversion'
description: 'Legacy PRD Conversion Assessment - Analyze legacy PRD and propose conversion strategy'
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
nextStepFile: './step-e-02-review.md'
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/src/modules/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
---
# Step E-1B: Legacy PRD Conversion Assessment
## STEP GOAL:
Analyze legacy PRD against BMAD standards, identify gaps, propose conversion strategy, and let user choose how to proceed.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring BMAD standards expertise and conversion guidance
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and edit requirements
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on conversion assessment and proposal
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to perform conversion yet (that comes in edit step)
- 💬 Approach: Analytical gap analysis with clear recommendations
- 🚪 This is a branch step - user chooses conversion path
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Analyze legacy PRD against BMAD standard
- 💾 Identify gaps and estimate conversion effort
- 📖 Present conversion options with effort estimates
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user selection
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: Legacy PRD, user's edit requirements, prd-purpose standards
- Focus: Conversion assessment only (not actual conversion)
- Limits: Don't convert yet, don't validate yet
- Dependencies: Step e-01 detected legacy format and routed here
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Assessment
**Try to use Task tool with sub-agent:**
"Perform legacy PRD conversion assessment:
**Load the PRD and prd-purpose.md**
**For each BMAD PRD section, analyze:**
1. Does PRD have this section? (Executive Summary, Success Criteria, Product Scope, User Journeys, Functional Requirements, Non-Functional Requirements)
2. If present: Is it complete and well-structured?
3. If missing: What content exists that could migrate to this section?
4. Effort to create/complete: Minimal / Moderate / Significant
**Identify:**
- Core sections present: {count}/6
- Content gaps in each section
- Overall conversion effort: Quick / Moderate / Substantial
- Recommended approach: Full restructuring vs targeted improvements
Return conversion assessment with gap analysis and effort estimate."
**Graceful degradation (if no Task tool):**
- Manually check PRD for each BMAD section
- Note what's present and what's missing
- Estimate conversion effort
- Identify best conversion approach
### 2. Build Gap Analysis
**For each BMAD core section:**
**Executive Summary:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**Success Criteria:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**Product Scope:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**User Journeys:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**Functional Requirements:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**Non-Functional Requirements:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**Overall Assessment:**
- Sections Present: {count}/6
- Total Conversion Effort: [Quick/Moderate/Substantial]
- Recommended: [Full restructuring / Targeted improvements]
### 3. Present Conversion Assessment
Display:
"**Legacy PRD Conversion Assessment**
**Current PRD Structure:**
- Core sections present: {count}/6
{List which sections are present/missing}
**Gap Analysis:**
{Present gap analysis table showing each section's status and effort}
**Overall Conversion Effort:** {effort level}
**Your Edit Goals:**
{Reiterate user's stated edit requirements}
**Recommendation:**
{Based on effort and user goals, recommend best approach}
**How would you like to proceed?**"
### 4. Present MENU OPTIONS
**[R] Restructure to BMAD** - Full conversion to BMAD format, then apply your edits
**[I] Targeted Improvements** - Apply your edits to existing structure without restructuring
**[E] Edit & Restructure** - Do both: convert format AND apply your edits
**[X] Exit** - Review assessment and decide
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
- Only proceed based on user selection
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- IF R (Restructure): Note conversion mode, then load next step
- IF I (Targeted): Note targeted mode, then load next step
- IF E (Edit & Restructure): Note both mode, then load next step
- IF X (Exit): Display summary, exit
### 5. Document Conversion Strategy
Store conversion decision for next step:
- **Conversion mode:** [Full restructuring / Targeted improvements / Both]
- **Edit requirements:** [user's requirements from step e-01]
- **Gap analysis:** [summary of gaps identified]
Display: "**Conversion Strategy Documented**
Mode: {conversion mode}
Edit goals: {summary}
**Proceeding to deep review...**"
Load and execute {nextStepFile} (step-e-02-review.md)
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- All 6 BMAD core sections analyzed for gaps
- Effort estimates provided for each section
- Overall conversion effort assessed correctly
- Clear recommendation provided based on effort and user goals
- User chooses conversion strategy (restructure/targeted/both)
- Conversion strategy documented for next step
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Not analyzing all 6 core sections
- Missing effort estimates
- Not providing clear recommendation
- Auto-proceeding without user selection
- Not documenting conversion strategy
**Master Rule:** Legacy PRDs need conversion assessment so users understand the work involved and can choose the best approach.

View File

@@ -1,249 +0,0 @@
---
name: 'step-e-02-review'
description: 'Deep Review & Analysis - Thoroughly review existing PRD and prepare detailed change plan'
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
nextStepFile: './step-e-03-edit.md'
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
validationReport: '{validation_report_path}' # If provided
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/src/modules/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
---
# Step E-2: Deep Review & Analysis
## STEP GOAL:
Thoroughly review the existing PRD, analyze validation report findings (if provided), and prepare a detailed change plan before editing.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring analytical expertise and improvement planning
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and approval authority
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on review and analysis, not editing yet
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make changes to PRD in this step
- 💬 Approach: Thorough analysis with user confirmation on plan
- 🚪 This is a middle step - user confirms plan before proceeding
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Load and analyze validation report (if provided)
- 🎯 Deep review of entire PRD
- 🎯 Map validation findings to specific sections
- 🎯 Prepare detailed change plan
- 💬 Get user confirmation on plan
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed to edit without user approval
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: PRD file, validation report (if provided), user requirements from step e-01
- Focus: Analysis and planning only (no editing)
- Limits: Don't change PRD yet, don't validate yet
- Dependencies: Step e-01 completed - requirements and format known
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Deep Review
**Try to use Task tool with sub-agent:**
"Perform deep PRD review and change planning:
**Context from step e-01:**
- User's edit requirements: {user_requirements}
- PRD format: {BMAD/legacy}
- Validation report provided: {yes/no}
- Conversion mode: {restructure/targeted/both} (if legacy)
**IF validation report provided:**
1. Extract all findings from validation report
2. Map findings to specific PRD sections
3. Prioritize by severity: Critical > Warning > Informational
4. For each critical issue: identify specific fix needed
5. For user's manual edit goals: identify where in PRD to apply
**IF no validation report:**
1. Read entire PRD thoroughly
2. Analyze against BMAD standards (from prd-purpose.md)
3. Identify issues in:
- Information density (anti-patterns)
- Structure and flow
- Completeness (missing sections/content)
- Measurability (unmeasurable requirements)
- Traceability (broken chains)
- Implementation leakage
4. Map user's edit goals to specific sections
**Output:**
- Section-by-section analysis
- Specific changes needed for each section
- Prioritized action list
- Recommended order for applying changes
Return detailed change plan with section breakdown."
**Graceful degradation (if no Task tool):**
- Manually read PRD sections
- Manually analyze validation report findings (if provided)
- Build section-by-section change plan
- Prioritize changes by severity/user goals
### 2. Build Change Plan
**Organize by PRD section:**
**For each section (in order):**
- **Current State:** Brief description of what exists
- **Issues Identified:** [List from validation report or manual analysis]
- **Changes Needed:** [Specific changes required]
- **Priority:** [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
- **User Requirements Met:** [Which user edit goals address this section]
**Include:**
- Sections to add (if missing)
- Sections to update (if present but needs work)
- Content to remove (if incorrect/leakage)
- Structure changes (if reformatting needed)
### 3. Prepare Change Plan Summary
**Summary sections:**
**Changes by Type:**
- **Additions:** {count} sections to add
- **Updates:** {count} sections to update
- **Removals:** {count} items to remove
- **Restructuring:** {yes/no} if format conversion needed
**Priority Distribution:**
- **Critical:** {count} changes (must fix)
- **High:** {count} changes (important)
- **Medium:** {count} changes (nice to have)
- **Low:** {count} changes (optional)
**Estimated Effort:**
[Quick/Moderate/Substantial] based on scope and complexity
### 4. Present Change Plan to User
Display:
"**Deep Review Complete - Change Plan**
**PRD Analysis:**
{Brief summary of PRD current state}
{If validation report provided:}
**Validation Findings:**
{count} issues identified: {critical} critical, {warning} warnings
**Your Edit Requirements:**
{summary of what user wants to edit}
**Proposed Change Plan:**
**By Section:**
{Present section-by-section breakdown}
**By Priority:**
- Critical: {count} items
- High: {count} items
- Medium: {count} items
**Estimated Effort:** {effort level}
**Questions:**
1. Does this change plan align with what you had in mind?
2. Any sections I should add/remove/reprioritize?
3. Any concerns before I proceed with edits?
**Review the plan and let me know if you'd like any adjustments.**"
### 5. Get User Confirmation
Wait for user to review and provide feedback.
**If user wants adjustments:**
- Discuss requested changes
- Revise change plan accordingly
- Represent for confirmation
**If user approves:**
- Note: "Change plan approved. Proceeding to edit step."
- Continue to step 6
### 6. Document Approved Plan
Store approved change plan for next step:
- **Approved changes:** Section-by-section list
- **Priority order:** Sequence to apply changes
- **User confirmed:** Yes
Display: "**Change Plan Approved**
{Brief summary of approved plan}
**Proceeding to edit step...**"
Load and execute {nextStepFile} (step-e-03-edit.md)
### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS (If User Wants Discussion)
**[A] Advanced Elicitation** - Get additional perspectives on change plan
**[P] Party Mode** - Discuss with team for more ideas
**[C] Continue to Edit** - Proceed with approved plan
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
- Only proceed to edit when user selects 'C'
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- IF A: Execute {advancedElicitationTask}, then return to discussion
- IF P: Execute {partyModeWorkflow}, then return to discussion
- IF C: Document approval, then load {nextStepFile}
- IF Any other: discuss, then redisplay menu
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- Validation report findings fully analyzed (if provided)
- Deep PRD review completed systematically
- Change plan built section-by-section
- Changes prioritized by severity/user goals
- User presented with clear plan
- User confirms or adjusts plan
- Approved plan documented for next step
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Not analyzing validation report findings (if provided)
- Superficial review instead of deep analysis
- Missing section-by-section breakdown
- Not prioritizing changes
- Proceeding without user approval
**Master Rule:** Plan before editing. Thorough analysis ensures we make the right changes in the right order. User approval prevents misalignment.

View File

@@ -1,253 +0,0 @@
---
name: 'step-e-03-edit'
description: 'Edit & Update - Apply changes to PRD following approved change plan'
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
nextStepFile: './step-e-04-complete.md'
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/src/modules/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
---
# Step E-3: Edit & Update
## STEP GOAL:
Apply changes to the PRD following the approved change plan from step e-02, including content updates, structure improvements, and format conversion if needed.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 ALWAYS generate content WITH user input/approval
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring analytical expertise and precise editing skills
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and approval authority
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on implementing approved changes from step e-02
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make changes beyond the approved plan
- 💬 Approach: Methodical, section-by-section execution
- 🚪 This is a middle step - user can request adjustments
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Follow approved change plan systematically
- 💾 Edit PRD content according to plan
- 📖 Update frontmatter as needed
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without completion
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: PRD file, approved change plan from step e-02, prd-purpose standards
- Focus: Implementing changes from approved plan only
- Limits: Don't add changes beyond plan, don't validate yet
- Dependencies: Step e-02 completed - plan approved by user
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
### 1. Retrieve Approved Change Plan
From step e-02, retrieve:
- **Approved changes:** Section-by-section list
- **Priority order:** Sequence to apply changes
- **User requirements:** Edit goals from step e-01
Display: "**Starting PRD Edits**
**Change Plan:** {summary}
**Total Changes:** {count}
**Estimated Effort:** {effort level}
**Proceeding with edits section by section...**"
### 2. Attempt Sub-Process Edits (For Complex Changes)
**Try to use Task tool with sub-agent for major sections:**
"Execute PRD edits for {section_name}:
**Context:**
- Section to edit: {section_name}
- Current content: {existing content}
- Changes needed: {specific changes from plan}
- BMAD PRD standards: Load from prd-purpose.md
**Tasks:**
1. Read current PRD section
2. Apply specified changes
3. Ensure BMAD PRD principles compliance:
- High information density (no filler)
- Measurable requirements
- Clear structure
- Proper markdown formatting
4. Return updated section content
Apply changes and return updated section."
**Graceful degradation (if no Task tool):**
- Perform edits directly in current context
- Load PRD section, apply changes, save
### 3. Execute Changes Section-by-Section
**For each section in approved plan (in priority order):**
**a) Load current section**
- Read the current PRD section content
- Note what exists
**b) Apply changes per plan**
- Additions: Create new sections with proper content
- Updates: Modify existing content per plan
- Removals: Remove specified content
- Restructuring: Reformat content to BMAD standard
**c) Update PRD file**
- Apply changes to PRD
- Save updated PRD
- Verify changes applied correctly
**Display progress after each section:**
"**Section Updated:** {section_name}
Changes: {brief summary}
{More sections remaining...}"
### 4. Handle Restructuring (If Needed)
**If conversion mode is "Full restructuring" or "Both":**
**For restructuring:**
- Reorganize PRD to BMAD standard structure
- Ensure proper ## Level 2 headers
- Reorder sections logically
- Update PRD frontmatter to match BMAD format
**Follow BMAD PRD structure:**
1. Executive Summary
2. Success Criteria
3. Product Scope
4. User Journeys
5. Domain Requirements (if applicable)
6. Innovation Analysis (if applicable)
7. Project-Type Requirements
8. Functional Requirements
9. Non-Functional Requirements
Display: "**PRD Restructured**
BMAD standard structure applied.
{Sections added/reordered}"
### 5. Update PRD Frontmatter
**Ensure frontmatter is complete and accurate:**
```yaml
---
workflowType: 'prd'
workflow: 'create' # or 'validate' or 'edit'
classification:
domain: '{domain}'
projectType: '{project_type}'
complexity: '{complexity}'
inputDocuments: [list of input documents]
stepsCompleted: ['step-e-01-discovery', 'step-e-02-review', 'step-e-03-edit']
lastEdited: '{current_date}'
editHistory:
- date: '{current_date}'
changes: '{summary of changes}'
---
```
**Update frontmatter accordingly.**
### 6. Final Review of Changes
**Load complete updated PRD**
**Verify:**
- All approved changes applied correctly
- PRD structure is sound
- No unintended modifications
- Frontmatter is accurate
**If issues found:**
- Fix them now
- Note corrections made
**If user wants adjustments:**
- Accept feedback and make adjustments
- Re-verify after adjustments
### 7. Confirm Completion
Display:
"**PRD Edits Complete**
**Changes Applied:** {count} sections modified
**PRD Updated:** {prd_file_path}
**Summary of Changes:**
{Brief bullet list of major changes}
**PRD is ready for:**
- Use in downstream workflows (UX, Architecture)
- Validation (if not yet validated)
**What would you like to do next?**"
### 8. Present MENU OPTIONS
**[V] Run Validation** - Execute full validation workflow (steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md)
**[S] Summary Only** - End with summary of changes (no validation)
**[A] Adjust** - Make additional edits
**[X] Exit** - Exit edit workflow
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
- Only proceed based on user selection
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- IF V (Validate): Display "Starting validation workflow..." then load and execute steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md
- IF S (Summary): Present edit summary and exit
- IF A (Adjust): Accept additional requirements, loop back to editing
- IF X (Exit): Display summary and exit
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- All approved changes from step e-02 applied correctly
- Changes executed in planned priority order
- Restructuring completed (if needed)
- Frontmatter updated accurately
- Final verification confirms changes
- User can proceed to validation or exit with summary
- Option to run validation seamlessly integrates edit and validate modes
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Making changes beyond approved plan
- Not following priority order
- Missing restructuring (if conversion mode)
- Not updating frontmatter
- No final verification
- Not saving updated PRD
**Master Rule:** Execute the plan exactly as approved. PRD is now ready for validation or downstream use. Validation integration ensures quality.

View File

@@ -1,168 +0,0 @@
---
name: 'step-e-04-complete'
description: 'Complete & Validate - Present options for next steps including full validation'
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
validationWorkflow: './steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md'
---
# Step E-4: Complete & Validate
## STEP GOAL:
Present summary of completed edits and offer next steps including seamless integration with validation workflow.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 ALWAYS generate content WITH user input/approval
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring synthesis and summary expertise
- ✅ User chooses next actions
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on presenting summary and options
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make additional changes
- 💬 Approach: Clear, concise summary with actionable options
- 🚪 This is the final edit step - no more edits
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Compile summary of all changes made
- 🎯 Present options clearly with expected outcomes
- 📖 Route to validation if user chooses
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user selection
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: Updated PRD file, edit history from step e-03
- Focus: Summary and options only (no more editing)
- Limits: Don't make changes, just present options
- Dependencies: Step e-03 completed - all edits applied
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
### 1. Compile Edit Summary
From step e-03 change execution, compile:
**Changes Made:**
- Sections added: {list with names}
- Sections updated: {list with names}
- Content removed: {list}
- Structure changes: {description}
**Edit Details:**
- Total sections affected: {count}
- Mode: {restructure/targeted/both}
- Priority addressed: {Critical/High/Medium/Low}
**PRD Status:**
- Format: {BMAD Standard / BMAD Variant / Legacy (converted)}
- Completeness: {assessment}
- Ready for: {downstream use cases}
### 2. Present Completion Summary
Display:
"**✓ PRD Edit Complete**
**Updated PRD:** {prd_file_path}
**Changes Summary:**
{Present bulleted list of major changes}
**Edit Mode:** {mode}
**Sections Modified:** {count}
**PRD Format:** {format}
**PRD is now ready for:**
- Downstream workflows (UX Design, Architecture)
- Validation to ensure quality
- Production use
**What would you like to do next?**"
### 3. Present MENU OPTIONS
Display:
**[V] Run Full Validation** - Execute complete validation workflow (steps-v) to verify PRD quality
**[E] Edit More** - Make additional edits to the PRD
**[S] Summary** - End with detailed summary of changes
**[X] Exit** - Exit edit workflow
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
- Only proceed based on user selection
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- **IF V (Run Full Validation):**
- Display: "**Starting Validation Workflow**"
- Display: "This will run all 13 validation checks on the updated PRD."
- Display: "Preparing to validate: {prd_file_path}"
- Display: "**Proceeding to validation...**"
- Load, read entire file, then execute {validationWorkflow} (steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md)
- Note: This hands off to the validation workflow which will run its complete 13-step process
- **IF E (Edit More):**
- Display: "**Additional Edits**"
- Ask: "What additional edits would you like to make?"
- Accept input, then display: "**Returning to edit step...**"
- Load and execute step-e-03-edit.md again
- **IF S (Summary):**
- Display detailed summary including:
- Complete list of all changes made
- Before/after comparison (key improvements)
- Recommendations for next steps
- Display: "**Edit Workflow Complete**"
- Exit
- **IF X (Exit):**
- Display summary
- Display: "**Edit Workflow Complete**"
- Exit
- **IF Any other:** Help user, then redisplay menu
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- Complete edit summary compiled accurately
- All changes clearly documented
- Options presented with clear expectations
- Validation option seamlessly integrates with steps-v workflow
- User can validate, edit more, or exit
- Clean handoff to validation workflow (if chosen)
- Edit workflow completes properly
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Missing changes in summary
- Not offering validation option
- Not documenting completion properly
- No clear handoff to validation workflow
**Master Rule:** Edit workflow seamlessly integrates with validation. User can edit → validate → edit again → validate again in iterative improvement cycle.