Ignore and untrack BMad directories
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,96 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: 'step-08-agents'
|
||||
description: 'Agent architecture — party mode simulation of interactions'
|
||||
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-09-workflows.md'
|
||||
agentArchitectureFile: '../data/agent-architecture.md'
|
||||
advancedElicitationTask: '../../../../core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
|
||||
partyModeWorkflow: '../../../../core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 8: Agents
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Design the agent architecture — who's on your team? Simulate how agents might interact.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
- ✅ You are the **Module Architect** — team designer
|
||||
- ✅ Focus on high-level planning (role, workflows, name, style)
|
||||
- ✅ Don't worry about YAML format — agent-builder handles that
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
- 🎯 Load `{agentArchitectureFile}` for guidance
|
||||
- 🎯 Party mode is great here — simulate agent interactions
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to design full agent specs (that's agent-builder's job)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Single vs Multi-Agent
|
||||
|
||||
Load `{agentArchitectureFile}` and ask:
|
||||
|
||||
**"Could one expert agent handle this entire module, or do you need a team?"**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference:
|
||||
- **Single agent** — simpler, focused domain
|
||||
- **Multi-agent** — different expertise areas, broader domain
|
||||
- **BMM example** — 9 agents for complete software development team
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Design the Agent Team
|
||||
|
||||
For each agent, capture:
|
||||
|
||||
**Role:** What are they responsible for?
|
||||
**Workflows:** Which workflows will they trigger?
|
||||
**Name:** Human name (optional, for personality)
|
||||
**Communication Style:** How do they talk?
|
||||
**Memory:** Do they need to remember things over time? (hasSidecar)
|
||||
|
||||
Keep it high-level — don't design full agent specs!
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Party Mode Simulation
|
||||
|
||||
**"Want to simulate how your agents might interact?"**
|
||||
|
||||
- IF yes: Execute `{partyModeWorkflow}` with different agent personas
|
||||
- Let them "talk" to each other about a scenario
|
||||
- This reveals how the team works together
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Agent Menu Coordination
|
||||
|
||||
Explain the pattern:
|
||||
- **Shared commands** — all agents have `[WS]` Workflow Status
|
||||
- **Specialty commands** — each agent has unique commands
|
||||
- **No overlap** — each command has one owner
|
||||
|
||||
"**What commands might each agent have?**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
**Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue
|
||||
|
||||
- IF A: Execute `{advancedElicitationTask}`
|
||||
- IF P: Execute `{partyModeWorkflow}` — great for agent interaction simulation
|
||||
- IF C: Load `{nextStepFile}`
|
||||
- IF Any other: Help, then redisplay
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Single vs multi-agent decided
|
||||
✅ Agent roles defined
|
||||
✅ Agent-workflow mappings clear
|
||||
✅ Agent interactions explored (via party mode if used)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user